The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
Untitled case2:09-cv-02214U.S. District Court, District of Nevada—unknown
Aspex Eyewear, Inc. et al. v. E'Lite Optik, Inc.CV-S-00-1116-PMP; 2:00-cv-01116U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada—judgment affirmed
Aspex Eyewear, Inc. et al. v. Altair Eyewear, Inc.7:02-cv-06195; 1:10-cv-12202U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts—concluded
Aspex Eyewear, Inc. et al. v. Zenni Optical, LLC0:09-cv-61467; 0:09-cv-61468U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida—judgment affirmed
Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Designers Eyewear Studio, Inc.——Markman opinion dated 2006-12-22
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Proxense, LLCIPR2021-01438Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—settled
Untitled case1:02-cv-20609U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida—unknown
Altair Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. et al.07-1407U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (from S.D.N.Y.)—unknown
Proxense, LLC v. Google LLC et al.6:23-cv-00320U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division—pending
Google LLC v. Proxense, LLCIPR2024-00783Patent Trial and Appeal Board—instituted; FWD entered; terminated as to Google
Apple Inc. v. Proxense, LLCIPR2025-00075Patent Trial and Appeal Board—joined; final written decision
Google LLC v. Proxense, LLCIPR2024-00782Patent Trial and Appeal Board—Final Written Decision
Untitled case26-1283U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit——
Untitled case6:24-cv-00302U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas—unverified
Google LLC v. Proxense, LLCIPR2024-00784Patent Trial and Appeal Board, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office—settled
CyboEnergy, Inc. v. Altenergy Power System USA, Inc.6:22-cv-01136W.D. Tex.—partial dismissal; claim construction; status unconfirmed
Sol IP, LLC v. [defendant — unconfirmed]5:20-cv-00399N.D. Cal.—unverified
Juniper v. Palo Alto Networks———
Storage Technology Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al.C 00-1176 (SI)U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division—judgment for Cisco
Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Lt…2:17-cv-00145-JRG-RSPE.D. Tex.—claim construction held; later outcome not confirmed