The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

High-Tech (T)(68)Other (O)(43)Medical (M)(5)

All litigations

Case	Patents	Court	Filed	Status
Untitled caseIPR2014-00077	7177798	Patent Trial and Appeal Board	—	not instituted (merits)
IPR2017-00245 (Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,950,013)IPR2017-00245	6950013	U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board	—	terminated by settlement
Affymetrix, Inc. v. Hyseq, Inc. et al.	6018041	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California	—	claim construction ruling
Wapp Tech LP et al. v. Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company4:18-cv-00468	9298864	E.D. Tex.	—	stayed/effectively resolved
Wapp Tech LP et al. v. Bank of America Corp.4:18-cv-00519	9298864	E.D. Tex.	—	settled/dismissed with prejudice
Untitled case1:18-cv-01585	9298864	Delaware District Court	—	unverified
Wapp Tech Limited Partnership v. Bank of America Corp.4:18-cv-00519-ALM	9971678 8924192 9298864	E.D. Tex.	—	dismissed with prejudice
Wapp Tech Limited Partnership v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.4:23-cv-01137-ALM	9971678 8924192 9298864 10353811 10691579	E.D. Tex.	—	claim construction; disposition unconfirmed
Adapt Pharma Operations Limited et al. v. Perrigo UK FINCO Limited Partnership2:18-cv-15287	9192570 9468747 9561177 9629965 9775838 10085937	U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey	—	related action
AntiOp, Inc. v. Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	9192570	—	—	decided at Rule 12(b)(6)/forum-selection stage
Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.1:10-cv-01055-RGA	7155451	U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware	—	concluded
Adapt Pharma Operations Ltd. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.2020-2106	9629965	U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit	—	affirmed
Adapt Pharma Operations Ltd. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.20-2106	9211253 9468747	U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit	—	affirmed
Untitled case6:13-cv-00196	7076275	U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas	—	unknown
SmartPhone Technologies LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al.6:12-cv-00350	6928300	U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas	—	claim construction issued 2013; final disposition unconfirmed
SmartPhone Technologies LLC v. Dell, Inc.6:12-cv-00154	6928300	U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas	—	unconfirmed
Untitled case2:24-cv-00881	9953240	U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division	—	—
Fiber, LLC v. Ciena Corporation et al.1:12-cv-01914	6430332	U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Denver	—	dismissed
Fiber, LLC v. Viavi Solutions, Inc. (f/k/a JDS Uniphase Corp.) et al.1:15-cv-01743-PAB-KLM	6430332	U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Denver	—	judgment
Fiber, LLC v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. (later Nokia of America Corp.) et al.1:15-cv-02135-PAB-KLM	6430332	U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Denver	—	judgment