The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
BlackBerry Limited v. Snap Inc.2:18-cv-02693-GW-(KSx)U.S. District Court, Central District of California (Western Division)—judgment
Untitled case2020-1258U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—on appeal
BlackBerry Limited v. Facebook et al.2:18-cv-01844-GW-KSU.S. District Court, Central District of California—related; consolidated for pretrial purposes; on appeal
Untitled case2020-1256U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—on appeal; outcome not stated
BlackBerry Limited v. Facebook, Inc. et al.2:18-cv-01844-GW-(KSx)U.S. District Court, Central District of California (related to the Twitter case; Judge George H. Wu)—final disposition not confirmed
Untitled case20-1256U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—not confirmed
BlackBerry Limited v. Snap Inc.2:18-cv-02693-GW-KSU.S. District Court for the Central District of California—final judgment; dismissed with prejudice
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.7:25-cv-00432W.D. Tex.—voluntarily dismissed with prejudice
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Middlegate Securities Inc.1:25-cv-09530S.D.N.Y.—voluntarily dismissed without prejudice
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Uhlmann Price Securities, LLC1:25-cv-15329N.D. Ill.—dismissed with prejudice
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Booking Holdings, Inc.7:25-cv-00148W.D. Tex.—active
Untitled case1:25-cv-06327E.D.N.Y.——
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Unitech America, Inc.2:21-cv-00387U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (E.D. Tex.)—unknown
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation et al. v. Klein Tools, Inc.337-TA-3755U.S. International Trade Commission—unconfirmed
Netlist, Inc. v. Inphi Corporation2:09-cv-06900U.S. District Court for the Central District of California—stayed in 2010; disposition not confirmed
Untitled case1:25-cv-00323U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho—parties/status not confirmed
Google LLC v. Netlist, Inc.U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—affirmed
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al. v. Southwest Airlines Co.7:24-cv-00277-ADAUnited States District Court for the Western District of Texas—transferred
AlmondNet, Inc. v. Oath Holdings Inc.1:19-cv-00247-LPSU.S. District Court for the District of Delaware—terminated
AlmondNet, Inc. et al. v. Microsoft Corp. et al.6:21-cv-00897U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas—dismissed with prejudice