Litigation
VirnetX Inc. v. Aastra et al.
multiple trials and appeals; Cisco non-infringement verdict6:10-cv-00417-LED
Auto-generating section 1 of 5: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Filed
- 2010-08-11
Patents at issue (4)
Plaintiffs (1)
Defendants (4)
Summary
VirnetX's case against multiple defendants; the '759 patent was part of the patent set. First Apple trial resulted in a ~$368M willful-infringement verdict. On appeal, VirnetX I, 767 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2014), affirmed validity and VPN-on-Demand infringement, vacated FaceTime infringement and damages, and remanded. The Cisco portion ended with a Cisco non-infringement verdict.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
In the news
What the press has reported about this case, summarized with links to the source articles.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).