Litigation
Unified Patents v. Bulletproof Property Management LLC
PendingIPR2026-00219
Patents at issue (1)
Plaintiffs (1)
Defendants (1)
Summary
Unified Patents filed this inter partes review (IPR) against Bulletproof Property Management LLC, the current assignee of US Patent 12221104, challenging the patent's validity.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Unified Patents has initiated an inter partes review (IPR) against Bulletproof Property Management LLC before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), challenging the validity of US Patent 12221104. Unified Patents is a member-based organization focused on deterring frivolous patent litigation and improving patent quality, primarily by challenging patents asserted by non-practicing entities (NPEs) through post-grant proceedings like IPRs. Bulletproof Property Management LLC, identified as a non-practicing entity (NPE), has been notably active, being recognized as the top patent owner in PTAB proceedings during the first quarter of 2026. The patent at issue, US Patent 12221104, titled "Vehicle gear selection control," was issued on February 11, 2025, and is categorized under vehicle technology (B60).
The procedural posture of this case is an Inter Partes Review, IPR2026-00219, filed on January 20, 2026, before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. While public records for IPR2026-00219 show Tesla Inc. as the petitioner challenging this patent, the authoritative case metadata for this summary identifies Unified Patents as the petitioner. Bulletproof Property Management LLC has also filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Tesla, Inc. in the Western District of Texas (1:2025cv00665) involving Judge Alan D. Albright, indicating the likely context for this IPR is to invalidate a patent asserted in infringement litigation concerning vehicle technology.
This case is notable due to Bulletproof Property Management LLC's high activity as an NPE patent owner at the PTAB, making it a frequent target for validity challenges. Unified Patents' involvement underscores its strategy of proactively challenging patents to reduce the impact of NPE assertions within specific technology sectors, such as the automotive industry implied by the patent's subject matter. The filing also occurs within a period (Q1 2026) marked by a significant decline in overall IPR petitions and an increase in discretionary denials by the PTAB, which highlights the strategic importance of each IPR filing.
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
The provided case metadata indicates "Unified Patents v. Bulletproof Property Management LLC" for IPR2026-00219. However, publicly available information identifies the petitioner for IPR2026-00219 as Tesla Inc., challenging US Patent 12221104 owned by Bulletproof Property Management LLC. This summary will reflect the information found through web searches, identifying Tesla Inc. as the petitioner.
Here are the key legal developments for IPR2026-00219:
Filing of IPR Petition (2026-01-20): Tesla Inc. filed an Inter Partes Review (IPR) petition, IPR2026-00219, with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) on January 20, 2026. The petition challenges the validity of U.S. Patent No. 12,221,104, which is currently assigned to Bulletproof Property Management LLC. The patent falls under Technology Center 3600.
Current Status: As of May 29, 2026, the IPR is pending. The PTAB has a statutory deadline to issue a decision on whether to institute the IPR within six months of the petition filing date. Therefore, an institution decision is anticipated around July 2026.
Parallel Proceedings: No specific parallel district court litigation or other PTAB proceedings involving US Patent 12221104 and Bulletproof Property Management LLC were explicitly identified in connection with this specific IPR (IPR2026-00219) within the search results. Bulletproof Property Management LLC was noted as a top patent owner at the PTAB in the first quarter of 2026, indicating their involvement in multiple PTAB proceedings.
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Unified Patents primarily utilizes its in-house legal team for IPR proceedings, supplemented by outside counsel from various law firms as needed. Given that IPR2026-00219 is a pending case, the specific attorneys of record would be listed on the PTAB docket. However, based on Unified Patents' operational model and past IPR filings, the following general information about their counsel can be provided.
Unified Patents In-House Counsel (Likely Roles as Lead Counsel/Senior Patent Counsel):
Unified Patents has a robust in-house legal team dedicated to post-grant proceedings. While specific assignments for IPR2026-00219 are not available without direct docket access, attorneys such as those listed on their "Team" page and in various news releases or job postings frequently serve as lead or senior patent counsel in their IPRs.
- Jonathan Stroud - Chief IP Counsel, Unified Patents (San Jose, California office). Jonathan Stroud has extensive experience in patent law and frequently participates in webinars and discussions on patent quality and IPRs.
- Jenn Bisk - Senior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents.
- Kyla Butler - Senior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents.
- Elaine Chow - Director of Patent Analytics, Unified Patents. While not primarily litigation counsel, her role in patent analytics is crucial for IPR strategy.
- Jennifer Gallagher - (Role not specified in current search results, but listed on the team).
- Alyssa Holtslander - In-house counsel, Unified Patents. She has been noted as counsel in other IPR proceedings.
- Roshan Mansinghani - Legal Head-NPE, Unified Patents. He is experienced in IPRs and discussions related to NPEs.
- Jessica L.A. Marks - Senior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents. She has participated in webinars concerning patent issues.
- David Seastrunk - In-house counsel, Unified Patents.
- T.J. Murphy - In-house counsel, Unified Patents.
- Jordan Rossen - Senior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents.
- Michelle Aspen - Senior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents.
These in-house attorneys manage patent office proceedings internally, including drafting petitions, filing, and litigating IPRs and other post-grant procedures.
Outside Counsel:
Unified Patents also engages outside counsel from various law firms for specific IPRs. For example, in some proceedings, Stephen Cortiaus from Slater Matsil has represented Unified Patents. The selection of outside counsel often depends on the technical area of the patent, the specific legal issues, and the workload of the in-house team. Without direct access to the IPR2026-00219 docket, it's not possible to definitively name any specific outside counsel for this particular case.
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Despite aggressive web searches across various legal databases and news sources, including those tracking PTAB proceedings and patent litigation, the specific counsel of record representing Bulletproof Property Management LLC in IPR2026-00219 could not be definitively identified from publicly available information.
While Bulletproof Property Management LLC is recognized as an active patent owner in PTAB proceedings, and records show them involved in other litigation where attorney Michael Marron appeared on their behalf in a district court case (Bulletproof Property Management LLC v. Tesla, Inc. et al, 1:2025cv00665), this does not confirm his or any other attorney's representation in the specific IPR2026-00219 case.
Official PTAB dockets, typically accessible through the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Case Tracking System (P-TACTS), would list the counsel of record. However, direct access to detailed filings within P-TACTS is not available through general web search snippets. Therefore, the names, roles, firms, and relevant experience for the defendant's attorneys in IPR2026-00219 cannot be provided at this time.