Litigation
PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc. v. PPC Broadband, Inc.
leave to amend granted; '353 count not among patents construed at Markman; disposition of '353 count not confirmed4:12-cv-00623-JLH
Auto-generating section 1 of 5: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Filed
- 2012-10-04
Patents at issue (16)
Plaintiffs (1)
Defendants (1)
Summary
PerfectVision filed a declaratory-judgment action against PPC Broadband. The original complaint named six PPC patents, and PerfectVision later moved to add several newly issued PPC patents including the '353 patent; leave to amend was granted June 10, 2013. The August 29, 2014 Markman opinion identified a different set of six patents then at issue, indicating the '353 count may have dropped out, but the specific disposition order was not retrieved.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
In the news
What the press has reported about this case, summarized with links to the source articles.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).