Litigation
Epson Portland Inc. et al. v. Dongguan Ocbestjet Digital Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ocbestjet et al.
terminated; violation found337-TA-1452
Auto-generating section 1 of 5: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Filed
- 2025-05-13
- Terminated
- 2026-08-13
Patents at issue (5)
Defendants (20)
- Δ Dongguan Ocbestjet Digital Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ocbestjet
- Δ Ocbestjet Printer Consumables (HK) Co., Ltd.
- Δ Tatrix International China Co., Ltd.
- Δ Luozhi Trading Co., Ltd.
- Δ Shenzhen Hongxinyuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Jianjai / Vi-US
- Δ Shenzhen Kaizhen Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a PayForLess
- Δ Zhuhai Zhenyang Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Oinkwere
- Δ Shangrao Shixuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a Inkgo
- Δ Zhuhai Hengyunda Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Upriin
- Δ Zhuhai Rongtaida Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Hookink
- Δ Zhuhai Shi Wei Tai Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Ondula-A
- Δ Zhuhai Yixing Electronics Co., Ltd. d/b/a Greenjob USSOP
- Δ Mei Jin Technology HK Co. d/b/a YBFeir / MJing
- Δ ZhuHai MeiJiAn Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a HaloFox
- Δ Qiong Wang d/b/a 7-magic
- Δ Shen Zhen Sailing Technology Limited d/b/a Triple-Color
- Δ Zhuhai Shuofeng E-commerce Co., Ltd. d/b/a super-ink-club
- Δ Zhuhai Bowang Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a office-print-club
- Δ Mountain Peak, Inc. d/b/a Billiontree Technology USA, Inc., d/b/a Toner Kingdom (City of Industry, CA)
- Δ Straightouttaink, LP d/b/a discountinkllc / einkshop2014 / Inkpro / inkprousa (San Jose, CA)
Summary
Section 337 investigation into certain ink cartridges and components, also identified by complaint docket DN 3828 and styled in some sources as 337-TA-3828. Complainants Epson Portland Inc., Epson America, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation asserted US 8,764,172; US 9,370,934; US 11,535,038; US 12,240,248; and US 12,240,249 against twenty respondents. The Commission found a violation as to claims 1 and 7 of the asserted patents, issued a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders, set a 100% bond, and terminated the investigation on August 13, 2026, with publication on August 18, 2026.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
In the news
What the press has reported about this case, summarized with links to the source articles.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).