Litigation
Code200, UAB et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
final written decisionIPR2022-00353
Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Terminated
- 2023-06-27
Patents at issue (1)
Defendants (1)
Summary
Petitioners Code200, UAB, Teso LT, UAB, Metacluster LT, UAB, and Oxysales, UAB challenged claims 1, 2, 6–11, 13, 16, 18–25, 29–34, 36, 39, 41–46 of the '344 patent. The PTAB instituted on July 1, 2022, and issued a Final Written Decision holding all challenged claims unpatentable over Reiter et al.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).