Litigation
Celgene Corporation v. Hetero Labs Ltd. et al.
settled2:17-cv-03387
Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Court
- D.N.J.
Patents at issue (3)
Plaintiffs (1)
Summary
Celgene brought a §271(e)(2) ANDA action against Hetero in D.N.J. regarding the '428 patent. Hetero counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity/non-infringement of the '428 patent; the court issued a Markman ruling on 'treating multiple myeloma' in the '262, '3,939 and '428 patents, and the case was resolved by settlement.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).