I'll research this company before writing the profile.
Let me dig deeper into the real party in interest and the underlying dispute.
Xu Peicheng (Hong Kong) Optoelectronic Technology Co., Limited (Chinese: 旭佩成(香港)光電科技有限公司) is a private Hong Kong company limited by shares, incorporated 10 January 2023 (BRN 74763296, CR No. 3224075), with its registered office at Unit 1507C, 15/F, Eastcore, 398 Kwun Tong Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon. It is not publicly traded. No employee count, revenue, or funding data is published in any source I could verify. Hong Kong registry records list no parent, but in its PTAB filings the company names Shenzhen Yuyixin Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. as a co-real party in interest, indicating affiliation with that mainland Chinese lighting business. Its incorporation date and registered address are consistent with a special-purpose vehicle rather than an established manufacturer.
Products / operations. No product catalogue, company website, or trade presence for the Hong Kong entity could be verified. Its only documented activity is U.S. patent-office litigation. The technology at issue — LED curtain lamps and their driving/control apparatus — points to decorative LED lighting as the underlying commercial activity, likely conducted through the affiliated Shenzhen entity. On the available evidence it should be treated as an IP-holding/defensive vehicle, not a verifiable operating company.
Litigation posture. The tracked data show 1 PTAB case as "plaintiff" and 0 as defendant — but the plaintiff label reflects petitioner status in inter partes review, not district-court infringement claims. This is a defensive invalidity posture, not NPE assertion: Xu Peicheng is attacking patents owned by Semisilicon Technology Corp., a patent owner that itself actively sues Chinese sellers of LED products (e.g., Semisilicon v. Changzhou Jutai Electronic, N.D. Cal. 4:25-cv-02665; Semisilicon v. Huzhou Xinju Electronic Commerce, E.D. Tex. 4:26-cv-00979). No district-court case naming Xu Peicheng appears in the tracked data.
Notable cases. Xu Peicheng (Hong Kong) Optoelectronic Technology Co., Limited v. Semisilicon Technology Corp., IPR2024-00156, filed 8 November 2023, challenged U.S. Patent 8,884,546 ("Driving Apparatus for Light-Emitting Diode Curtain Lamp"); the Board instituted review on 20 May 2024 and entered a final written decision on 14 May 2025. A companion petition, IPR2024-00157, challenged U.S. Patent 8,124,988; institution was denied on 20 May 2024, rehearing denied 16 September 2024, and post-institution fees refunded. Counsel recorded: Rimon P.C. (petitioner) and Finnegan (patent owner). The same-day filings suggest a coordinated defensive strategy on behalf of an LED lighting seller.