Unknown Petitioner v. Omni MedSci, Inc.
Institution Granted- Docket:
- PGR2026-00003
- Terminated:
- 2026-05-06
A post-grant review proceeding was filed at the PTAB challenging patent 12193790, and the PTAB granted institution of the review.
Plaintiff
1 case as plaintiff.
Unknown Petitioner
"Unknown Petitioner" is a generic designation used in legal proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) for a party challenging the validity of a patent. As such, it does not refer to a specific legal entity, company, or organization with a distinct corporate profile, headquarters, or operational activities. Information regarding its founding, ownership, size, or specific products and services cannot be provided under this placeholder name.
In the context of patent litigation, "Unknown Petitioner" acts as the plaintiff in a PTAB proceeding, initiating a challenge to an existing patent. This action typically involves filing a petition for inter partes review (IPR) or post-grant review (PGR) to argue that certain patent claims are unpatentable.
The sole tracked case involving "Unknown Petitioner" is Unknown Petitioner v. Omni MedSci, Inc. before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. In this proceeding, "Unknown Petitioner" is challenging a patent owned by Omni MedSci, Inc. Omni MedSci, Inc., formed in Michigan in October 2010 and a subsidiary of Omni Technology Holdings, Inc., is a non-practicing entity (NPE) that asserts patents related to optical technology for measuring physiological parameters with wearable devices. Omni MedSci has been an active plaintiff in patent infringement lawsuits against major technology companies such as Apple, Samsung, Fossil, OnePlus, Oura Health, and WHOOP, frequently asserting patents naming Dr. Mohammed N. Islam as the sole inventor. The PTAB case therefore represents a challenge to Omni MedSci's asserted patent portfolio.
Watchlist
Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Unknown Petitioner files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.
A post-grant review proceeding was filed at the PTAB challenging patent 12193790, and the PTAB granted institution of the review.