Titan Technologies International Inc

Based on available information, there are multiple entities named "Titan Technologies," and the entity involved in the specified litigation appears distinct from a similarly named industrial company. The company named in the lawsuit is Titan International Technologies, LTD, a Hong Kong-based entity, while a well-documented US company is Titan Technologies International Inc.

Titan Technologies International Inc., based in Clifton, New Jersey, was a privately held company that provided hydraulic torque wrenches, pumps, and other powerful bolting tools for the oil and gas, wind, and shipbuilding industries. In 2014, the company had approximately 14 employees and revenues of about $5 million. On December 31, 2014, Titan Technologies International Inc. was acquired by Atlas Copco, a Swedish industrial company, and became part of its Chicago Pneumatic Tools division.

The patent litigation listed in the database involves a different entity: Titan International Technologies, LTD, which court records identify as a Hong Kong-based company. This entity has asserted patents related to the "Automated Detonation of Fireworks" against companies in the fireworks industry. As an entity with a record of filing patent infringement lawsuits and no evidence of products or services in the market, Titan International Technologies, LTD appears to be a non-practicing entity (NPE) focused on patent assertion.

The single case tracked in the database, Titan Technologies International Inc v. Phantom Fireworks Showrooms LLC et al., shows a plaintiff-only litigation history. This posture, with one case as a plaintiff and zero as a defendant, is often characteristic of a patent assertion entity. The case was filed at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which hears all patent appeals in the U.S.

While the provided database names the plaintiff as the New Jersey-based "Titan Technologies International Inc.," public court dockets for this case consistently name the plaintiff as "Titan International Technologies, LTD" of Hong Kong. The lawsuit alleges that products sold by Phantom Fireworks and co-defendants infringe on patents related to remote fireworks detonation systems. A district court granted summary judgment for the defendants after finding insufficient evidence that they were the correct parties responsible for the allegedly infringing products.