Plaintiff

New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Ass'n of NYC Health Center, Inc.

1 case as plaintiff.

Cases
1
Active
1
0 closed
Filed
2024
Top venue
S D N Y
1 case

Company profile

New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc., Health Center, Inc. (commonly "HCI" or the HTC Health Center, part of the Hotel Trades Council Employee Benefit Funds) is a New York not-for-profit corporation headquartered at 305 West 44th Street, New York, NY. It was established in 1949 under federal law as an ERISA-regulated health benefit plan and is organized as a 501(c)(9) voluntary employees' beneficiary association, jointly trusteed by union- and employer-designated trustees. It is not publicly traded. Its most recent IRS Form 990 (FY2024) reports roughly $294 million in revenue, about $283 million in expenses, and approximately 1,030 employees.

Operations. HCI owns and operates Article 28–licensed diagnostic and treatment centers — in Midtown Manhattan, Harlem, Brooklyn, and Queens — with on-site pharmacies and dental centers. It directly employs physicians, dentists, psychiatrists, nurses, and pharmacy staff and provides primary and specialty medical care, dental and oral surgery, radiology, vision, mental-health and addiction services, and prescription dispensing, at little or no cost to eligible New York City hotel and motel union members, their dependents, and retirees. Hospitalization and out-of-area care are delivered through contracted carriers (Anthem BlueCross BlueShield) and referral agreements; a cost-reimbursement contract with CMS covers Medicare-eligible retirees. It is an operating healthcare provider and benefit plan, not a patent-assertion entity.

Litigation posture. The tracked database shows exactly one case: as plaintiff, zero as defendant. This is a purchaser-side antitrust action, not a patent-infringement suit, so it does not reflect a patent-litigation or NPE posture at all.

Notable case. New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Health Center Inc. v. Celgene Corporation (No. 1:24-cv-02230, S.D.N.Y., filed March 25, 2024) alleged monopolization under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1–2 and state law, claiming Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb fraudulently procured pomalidomide (Pomalyst) patents, asserted them in sham litigation, and used reverse-payment settlements to delay generics. It was consolidated into the lead case Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co. v. Celgene Corp., 1:23-cv-07871-ER (Judge Edgardo Ramos). The court entered judgment for the defendants on April 10, 2026.

Keep this research.

Save to your free workspace, then choose whether to receive updates.