7 known cases. View patent page →
Patent infringement suit by Catalina Marketing Int'l against coolsavings.com. The district court granted summary judgment of no infringement, but the Federal Circuit vacated in part/affirmed in part and remanded, holding the preamble 'located at predesignated sites such as consumer stores' non-limiting as to claim 1. The asserted patent was U.S. 4,674,041, not the '851 patent.
Patent infringement suit by Catalina Marketing Corp. against LDM Group, LLC in E.D. Mo. The asserted patent was U.S. 6,240,394, not the '851 patent. Not verified beyond docket listing.
Blueprint IP Solutions, an NPE, sued Catalina Marketing Corp. in M.D. Fla. asserting U.S. 8,089,980, not the '851 patent. The case settled and was voluntarily dismissed.
Declaratory judgment action by Southwest eFuel Network against Catalina Marketing Corp. in N.D. Tex. The asserted patents were not confirmed. Dismissed without prejudice by Judge David C. Godbey.
Reported patent and unfair-competition suit by Catalina Marketing Corp. against Fuel Marketing Solutions in C.D. Cal., filed March 22. The complaint asserted three Catalina patents, described functionally but not by number; the description is consistent with the '851 patent family but 5,173,851 was not confirmed as asserted. Settled with FMS taking a license.
APA challenge to a USPTO patent-term-adjustment petition decision. Dismissed as unripe/for lack of standing. Not an infringement suit over the '851 patent.
Appeal to the Federal Circuit of a pending patent application rejection. Appellants include Catalina Marketing Corp. and Michael C. Scroggie. Concerns a pending application, not the issued '851 patent.