10757126

4 known cases. View patent page →

Cases
4
Active
1
3 closed
Filed
2021
Top venue
E.D. Virginia Norfolk
1 case

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Judgment as a matter of law granted in part and denied in part; new trial denied; dismissed in part as of October 3, 2024
Docket:
2:21-cv-00137 (orig. 1:21-cv-00313)
Filed:
2021-03-12
Patents:10785266105673431009124610567437105309031056741310659573107571261054202810503899107353801074990610931797
π Centripetal Networks, Inc.Δ Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Centripetal sued Palo Alto Networks asserting 13 patents, including 10,785,266. The case was tried to verdict; the court granted Palo Alto Networks' post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law in part, denied it in part, denied a new trial motion, and recorded the case as dismissed in part on October 3, 2024.

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. LookingGlass Cyber Solutions, Inc. et al.

Closed (disposition not verified)
Docket:
3:21-cv-00597 (orig. 1:21-cv-01051)
Filed:
2021-09-14
Patents:107852661075712610735380
π Centripetal Networks, Inc.Δ LookingGlass Cyber Solutions, Inc.Δ Gilman LouieΔ Alsop Louie Management LLCΔ Alsop Louie Capital 2, L.P.Δ Alsop Louie Partners 2, LLC

Centripetal sued LookingGlass and related defendants asserting 10,785,266 along with two other patents, plus claims for breach of contract and fiduciary duty. Case tracking services list the case as closed, but the specific disposition is unverified.

Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

post-judgment proceedings/appeal ongoing
Docket:
2:21-cv-00137
Filed:
2021-03-12
Patents:10749906100912461050389910530903105420281056734310567413105674371065957310735380107571261078526610931797
π Centripetal Networks, LLCΔ Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Centripetal Networks, LLC (sued as Centripetal Networks, Inc.) sued Palo Alto Networks asserting 13 patents, including '49906. A jury awarded about $151.1 million on other patents, but not '49906; post-trial, the court granted Palo Alto judgment as a matter of law of non-infringement on the '437 patent and reduced the award. Post-judgment proceedings and Centripetal's Federal Circuit appeal were ongoing.