10567343

Centripetal sued Palo Alto Networks asserting 13 patents, including 10,785,266. The case was tried to verdict; the court granted Palo Alto Networks' post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law in part, denied it in part, denied a new trial motion, and recorded the case as dismissed in part on October 3, 2024.

Centripetal Networks, LLC (sued as Centripetal Networks, Inc.) sued Palo Alto Networks asserting 13 patents, including '49906. A jury awarded about $151.1 million on other patents, but not '49906; post-trial, the court granted Palo Alto judgment as a matter of law of non-infringement on the '437 patent and reduced the award. Post-judgment proceedings and Centripetal's Federal Circuit appeal were ongoing.

Centripetal sued Keysight in the Eastern District of Virginia, with the '343 patent associated with the case alongside other Centripetal patents. The district case was related to ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1313 and was stayed. The full set of patents ultimately asserted was not confirmed.

Petition for inter partes review challenging claims 1-20 of the '343 patent. The PTAB denied institution on January 20, 2022.

Keysight petitioned for inter partes review of the '343 patent. The PTAB instituted review, denied the Patent Owner's request for Director review, and issued a Final Written Decision; the exact FWD date and merits outcome were not confirmed.

Palo Alto Networks petitioned for inter partes review of the '343 patent. The PTAB granted institution and issued a Final Written Decision, terminating the proceeding on August 5, 2024; the decision has been appealed to the Federal Circuit.

Federal Circuit appeal docketed as 25-1052 involving the '343 patent; the exact underlying case was not confirmed.