Defendant

TPL Group

1 case as defendant.

Cases
1
Active
0
1 closed
Filed
—
Top venue
Superior Court Of Santa Clara County California
1 case
Also appears as a plaintiff in 1 case → View as plaintiff

Company profile

TPL Group (The TPL Group; affiliated entity Technology Properties Limited LLC/Inc.), Cupertino, California — a privately held intellectual-property management and licensing company. It was founded in the mid-1980s (company materials give 1985; one later release says 1988). Chairman/CEO Daniel E. Leckrone has been the named executive in its litigation filings. No public filings disclose headcount or revenue, and no reliable third-party estimate was found, so size cannot be verified.

Operations. TPL describes itself as an IP management firm that develops, manages and commercializes patent portfolios, with its licensing arm Alliacense and, historically, an OnSpec division that developed flash-memory card-reader technology. Its best-known asset is the Moore Microprocessor Patent (MMP) Portfolio, jointly owned with publicly traded Patriot Scientific Corp. and named for Charles H. Moore (Forth language inventor; TPL's CTO). The portfolio covered microprocessor design techniques — separate CPU/I-O clocking, multiple instruction fetch, multiple cores/embedded memory — via roughly seven U.S. patents plus European and Japanese counterparts that expired around 2015. A second CORE Flash portfolio (32 U.S./international patents) covered flash-memory management and control. So TPL is substantially a licensing/assertion business rather than an operating manufacturer, though it is not a pure shell: it reported productized OnSpec technology and IP-management services.

Litigation posture. Consistent with the case data (1 as plaintiff, 1 as defendant), TPL is primarily an asserting party. It filed the tracked TPL Group et al. v. Fujitsu et al. action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Marshall Division) in October 2005 against Fujitsu, Matsushita, NEC and Toshiba over three MMP patents, explicitly choosing that venue for its "rocket docket" speed; ARM intervened as a defendant in 2006. It also filed ITC and E.D. Tex. complaints over CORE Flash in 2011–2012. The defendant-side case is Charles H. Moore v. TPL Group et al. (Santa Clara County Superior Court, 2010), in which Moore sued TPL and Alliacense alleging fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract.

Context. The MMP program generated many settlements and licenses (Intel, AMD, HP, Fujitsu, Nokia, among others), and analysts publicly characterized the Patriot/TPL assertion effort as patent-troll activity. TPL's commercialization arrangement with Patriot later became disputed, and licensing exclusivity and related litigation continued into the 2010s.