Defendant

TP-Link International Ltd.

1 case as defendant.

Company profile

TP-Link International Ltd. is a global provider of networking devices and smart home products, founded in 1996 in Shenzhen, China. The company operates with dual headquarters in Singapore and the US (Irvine, California), having separated from TP-Link Technologies Co., Ltd. in China in 2022. It is a private company, with Jeffrey (Jianjun) Chao and his wife Hillary as sole owners of TP-Link Systems Inc., the global parent company headquartered in Irvine, CA. TP-Link serves over 170 countries and has over 26,000 employees as of 2019.

TP-Link manufactures a wide range of products for consumer, business, and service provider markets. Its offerings include Wi-Fi routers, mesh Wi-Fi systems, range extenders, switches, modems, and adapters for consumer networking. For smart homes, they provide security cameras, smart plugs, and lighting under brands like Tapo and Kasa Smart. Additionally, TP-Link offers enterprise networking solutions (Omada), enterprise security (VIGI), carrier networking (Aginet), and software and cloud services. The company manufactures its products in-house and has been recognized as a leading Wi-Fi product provider.

TP-Link International Ltd. generally operates as a defendant in patent litigation, defending against suits brought by Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs). The provided data indicates one tracked case where TP-Link International Ltd. is a defendant. This aligns with a posture of an operating company defending its products against patent assertions. Many of these cases, including one involving TP-Link, have been filed in the Eastern District of Texas, a venue historically favored by patent plaintiffs.

A notable tracked case is Stingray IP Solutions, LLC v. TP-Link Technologies Co., Ltd. et al., where TP-Link was a defendant in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. This case originated from patent infringement suits filed by Stingray IP Solutions, an NPE focused on wireless networking IP, in the Eastern District of Texas. Other notable cases involving TP-Link as a defendant in the Western District of Texas include suits from NPEs such as WSOU Investments, LLC, and Monument Peak Ventures, LLC, asserting patents related to Wi-Fi routers, digital imaging, and video communication. TP-Link also faced a jury verdict of $37.5 million in a Wi-Fi 6 patent infringement case brought by Atlas Global Technologies LLC in the Eastern District of Texas. TP-Link has also been involved in a FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) rate-setting dispute with Huawei in the UK High Court concerning Wi-Fi 6 standard-essential patents, where Huawei withdrew infringement claims at the UPC and Munich Regional Court.

Stingray IP Solutions, LLC v. TP-Link Technologies Co., Ltd. et al.

Remanded
Docket:
23-102
Terminated:
2023-01-09
Patents:6980537

The Federal Circuit granted Stingray's petition for a writ of mandamus, vacating the district court's transfer orders to the Central District of California and remanding the cases for further proceedings. The Federal Circuit found that a patent infringement defendant's post-suit consent to personal jurisdiction in another state did not defeat the application of Rule 4(k)(2) for establishing jurisdiction.