I'll verify Peloton's profile with a few searches.
Let me verify the litigation context and a couple of corporate details.
Company overview. Peloton Interactive, Inc. (Nasdaq: PTON), commonly "Peloton," is a New York–headquartered fitness company founded in 2012, with principal offices at 441 Ninth Avenue. It is publicly traded and not a subsidiary of any parent. For fiscal 2026 (ended June 30, 2026) it reported total revenue of about $2.45 billion, roughly flat versus FY2025. Employee counts cited by data providers range from roughly 2,100 to 2,900 following multiple restructuring plans (MarketWatch, PitchBook, LSEG/FT, SEC 10-K).
Products / services / operations. Peloton operates an interactive fitness platform with two reportable segments. Connected Fitness Products ($770M FY2026 revenue) covers hardware sales and rentals, accessories, extended warranties and commercial contracts: the Bike and Bike+ bikes, Tread and Tread+ treadmills, the Row rower, and the Guide strength device, plus Precor-branded commercial fitness equipment acquired in 2021 for $420 million and folded into a commercial unit. The Subscription segment ($1.68B) sells monthly All-Access connected fitness memberships and Peloton App/App+ and Strength+ digital subscriptions with live and on-demand instructor-led classes in cycling, running, strength, yoga, Pilates and meditation. The company reported roughly 6 million members and about 2.8 million paid connected fitness subscriptions as of June 30, 2025.
Patent-litigation posture. Peloton is an operating company and appears purely as a defendant in the tracked data: one case as defendant, zero as plaintiff. It is being attacked, not asserting.
Notable cases. Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. (1:24-cv-08486) is the only tracked suit. Fleet Connect is characterized as a non-practicing entity asserting acquired wireless/OFDM communications patents (seven asserted), not a fitness competitor — Stanford's NPE Litigation Database lists it as an NPE. The case was filed in the Western District of Texas and transferred to the S.D.N.Y.; the record shows a voluntary dismissal in February 2025. Peloton's tracked IP exposure therefore comes from third-party assertion, not its own enforcement activity.