Unified Patents v. Paygeo LLC
Not Instituted - Procedural- Docket:
- IPR2025-01555
- Filed:
- 2025
Unified Patents filed an Inter Partes Review petition against Paygeo LLC concerning patent 12014347, which was not instituted due to procedural reasons.
Defendant
3 cases as defendant.
PayGeo, LLC is a privately held company with a focus on intellectual property related to secure financial transactions and digital wallet technology. The company's patent portfolio includes technologies for preventing fraudulent financial transactions, cashless transactions, and integrating various payment methods into a mobile digital wallet environment. These technologies also encompass features like demographic prediction for targeted advertising and advanced usage data management. PayGeo, LLC is based in California.
The company appears to be a non-practicing entity (NPE) that asserts its patent portfolio. This is indicated by its litigation posture, with one case as a plaintiff and three as a defendant in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. Their patent portfolio, as seen in the ongoing litigation, centers on "Kit, system and associated method and service for providing a platform to prevent fraudulent financial transactions."
PayGeo, LLC has been actively involved in patent litigation, primarily in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, a venue known for its plaintiff-friendly reputation in patent cases. In a notable case filed on April 1, 2025, PayGeo, LLC sued Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. for patent infringement related to secure transaction technology, including claims for a "directional movement" to initiate payment, impacting Samsung's Wallet, Pay, and Knox platforms.
In response to PayGeo's assertions, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. has initiated multiple challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), filing IPRs against PayGeo's patents. These include IPR2025-01554 and IPR2025-01555, both filed on September 30, 2025, challenging the validity of patents involved in the district court case. Unified Patents has also filed two IPRs against PayGeo LLC in 2025. This pattern of litigation suggests PayGeo, LLC is an NPE actively asserting its patent portfolio against operating companies.
Unified Patents filed an Inter Partes Review petition against Paygeo LLC concerning patent 12014347, which was not instituted due to procedural reasons.
Unified Patents LLC challenged US patent 10796296 in a PTAB Inter Partes Review, which was not instituted for procedural reasons.
An Inter Partes Review (IPR) was filed against patent 8554671, which was subsequently not instituted due to procedural reasons.