Mesa Digital, LLC v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.
dismissed without prejudice- Docket:
- 1:25-cv-11609
- Filed:
- 2025-09-24
- Terminated:
- 2025-10-06
Mesa Digital voluntarily dismissed the case without prejudice.
Defendant
6 cases as defendant.
Motorola Mobility LLC, commonly known as Motorola, is an American consumer electronics manufacturer headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. Founded on January 4, 2011, as a spin-off from Motorola Inc., the company became a wholly owned subsidiary of Chinese technology conglomerate Lenovo in 2014, following a period of ownership by Google from 2012 to 2014. As of late 2025, Motorola Mobility has an estimated annual revenue of approximately $9.4 billion and a workforce of around 12,800 employees globally.
Motorola Mobility primarily develops and manufactures Android-based smartphones and other mobile devices. Its major product lines include the high-end Edge series, the foldable Razr series, and the accessible Moto G and Moto E series smartphones. Beyond smartphones, the company's offerings extend to smartwatches, tablets, and mobile accessories such as wireless headphones, battery packs, and cases. It also markets smart home devices, including baby monitors, security systems, routers, and modems.
Based on the authoritative case data, Motorola Mobility, Inc. is involved in one tracked patent litigation case, appearing solely as a defendant. The company's current posture in tracked patent litigation is defensive, indicating it is an operating company defending against patent assertion claims. The sole tracked case, Mesa Digital, LLC v. Motorola Mobility, Inc., was filed in the Northern District of Illinois on September 24, 2025.
Historically, Motorola Mobility has been involved in extensive patent litigation, including notable disputes with Apple. Google's acquisition of Motorola Mobility in 2012 was largely motivated by a desire to gain its substantial patent portfolio to protect other Android vendors from litigation, though Google retained most of these patents when it sold Motorola Mobility to Lenovo in 2014. This complex history reflects its ongoing role as an operating company that actively manages its intellectual property and defends its product lines.
Mesa Digital voluntarily dismissed the case without prejudice.
On remand from the Federal Circuit, the ITC conducted Phase 1 of the remand in Inv. No. 337-TA-750. The investigation was terminated on June 16, 2014, with no violation of Section 337 and no exclusion order.
Apple filed a Section 337 complaint against Motorola asserting US 7,812,828, US 7,663,607, and US 5,379,430. The ALJ found literal infringement of the asserted '607 claims but held them invalid; the Commission affirmed invalidity under §103 and terminated the investigation with no violation.
Apple asserted U.S. Patent 5,379,430 (claims 1, 3, and 5) against Motorola Android smartphones as Count III of its complaint. On November 5, 2012, the morning trial was to begin, Judge Barbara B. Crabb dismissed the case with prejudice; the narrative states there was no merits ruling on the '430 patent.
Apple appealed the ITC's determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-750. The Federal Circuit affirmed anticipation of '607 claims 1–7, reversed anticipation of claim 10, vacated the obviousness ruling for failure to weigh objective evidence, and reversed and remanded the '828 claim construction.
One of eight severed Delaware actions from SoftView's lead case; the Notice of Related Matters identifies it as involving US 7,831,926, and the Second Amended Complaint asserted the '353 and '926 patents. Terminated by global settlement in October 2015.