Defendant
3 cases as defendant.
Jumio Corporation is a private technology company headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, specializing in online identity verification and authentication services. While the original Jumio Inc. was founded in 2010, Jumio Corporation was established in May 2016 after the prior entity was sold following bankruptcy proceedings. The company is backed by private equity firms including Centana Growth Partners and Great Hill Partners. Jumio has reported clearing over $200 million in bookings in 2022, and has been cited with employee counts ranging from hundreds to over a thousand in recent years. Mark Lorion was appointed CEO in April 2026, with Bala Kumar serving as President and Chief Product and Technology Officer.
Jumio's core offerings include AI-powered identity verification solutions that leverage biometrics, machine learning, computer vision, and liveness detection. These services enable businesses to verify user identities by scanning government-issued IDs, passports, or other documents and performing facial recognition. The company's technology, including products like the Jumio KYX Platform and Jumio Go, is designed to combat fraud, ensure compliance with KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) regulations, and streamline customer onboarding for clients in financial services, digital currency, retail, travel, and online gaming sectors.
Jumio Corporation is an active participant in patent litigation, appearing in a two-way dispute scenario. The company has been involved in five tracked cases, acting as a plaintiff in two instances and as a defendant in three. All these cases involve FaceTec, Inc., with Jumio filing patent challenges against FaceTec, Inc. at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the USPTO, and simultaneously defending against infringement allegations brought by FaceTec, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. This pattern indicates direct competition and assertion of intellectual property rights between these two operating companies.
The court denied FaceTec's motion to voluntarily dismiss without prejudice, granted a motion to intervene (presumably by iProov), and FaceTec filed an opposition to a motion for a stay.
A district court case filed by FaceTec, Inc. against Jumio Corporation in the Northern District of California, where the court denied a motion to voluntarily dismiss and granted a motion to intervene. FaceTec, Inc. also filed an opposition to a motion for stay.
An active case where FaceTec, Inc. has filed an opposition to a motion for stay, and the case involves Jumio Corporation's IPR petitions related to US Patent 11157606.