Defendant

Genband US LLC

3 cases as defendant.

Cases
3
Active
0
3 closed
Filed
2014–2018
Top venue
Fed. Cir.
2 cases
Also appears as a plaintiff in 8 cases → View as plaintiff

Company profile

I'll research this company before writing the profile.

Let me verify the merger/parent details and the Federal Circuit 2018 case.

Genband US LLC — Company Profile

Overview. Genband US LLC (commonly "GENBAND," formerly General Bandwidth) was founded in 1999 and was headquartered in Plano, Texas (earlier Frisco, Texas). It was a privately held, venture-backed company that raised roughly $712 million across its life, with investors including Sevin Rosen Funds, Venrock, Oak Investment Partners and Sequoia. Reported size varies by source: PitchBook cites about 1,600 employees as of 2016, while Dealroom lists a 500–1,000 headcount band and $100–500 million revenue. On October 27, 2017, GENBAND completed a "merger of equals" with Sonus Networks, Inc.; each became a wholly owned subsidiary of a new parent renamed Sonus Networks and then Ribbon Communications Inc. (Nasdaq: RBBN). GENBAND's former holders received roughly 50% of the combined company plus a $22.5 million unsecured note. GENBAND US LLC is therefore no longer independent; it is a subsidiary within Ribbon Communications.

Products / operations. GENBAND was an operating telecommunications-equipment and software vendor, not an NPE. It sold IP-based real-time communications products for fixed, mobile and cable service providers and large enterprises — session border controllers, softswitches and integrated softswitches, media gateways, call feature servers, IMS/voice-over-IP network infrastructure, SIP trunking, small-cell/carrier Wi-Fi and network-virtualization offerings, plus the "Kandy" cloud communications platform. It held hundreds of patents, many derived from VoIP and media-gateway technology.

Litigation posture. The tracked record shows a two-way litigant: 2 plaintiff cases and 1 defendant case. This is consistent with an operating company asserting its own product patents against a direct competitor while simultaneously defending against that competitor's counter-suits — not an acquired-portfolio assertion strategy. The core disputes clustered in the plaintiff-friendly Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Judge Rodney Gilstrap).

Notable cases. In Genband US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Ltd. (E.D. Tex., filed January 2014, No. 2:14-cv-33), a jury found Metaswitch infringed seven GENBAND VoIP patents and awarded about $8.17 million; the Federal Circuit later vacated the denial of a permanent injunction (Genband US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Corp., No. 17-1148, July 10, 2017). Metaswitch's follow-on suit, Metaswitch Networks Ltd. v. Genband US LLC (No. 2:14-cv-744), produced a defense verdict for GENBAND in March 2016; a subsequent appeal, Metaswitch Networks Ltd. v. Genband US LLC, reached the Federal Circuit in 2018. Related trade-secret and antitrust actions followed in Texas state court and the S.D.N.Y.

Filing activity

2014: 1 case'14'15'16'172018: 2 cases2'18
Cases filed per year naming Genband US LLC as defendant.

Metaswitch Networks Corp. v. Genband US LLC

likely settled
Docket:
2018-1869
Filed:
2018-04-19
Patents:7995589

Metaswitch appealed the April 2018 final judgment in the 2:14-cv-00033 action, which included the '589 Patent. The record shows a joint notice of settlement and stay in 2019, and the district court entered a settlement/dismissal order on July 1, 2019; no Federal Circuit merits opinion was retrieved.

Metaswitch Networks Ltd. v. Genband US LLC et al.

judgment; no damages; costs awarded to Genband
Docket:
2:14-cv-00744
Filed:
2014-07-07
Terminated:
2016-04-14
Patents:6791971

Mirror-image Eastern District of Texas case brought by Metaswitch against Genband and Genband Management Services. Trial ended March 17, 2016 with no damages awarded to either party; final judgment on April 14, 2016 awarded Genband costs as prevailing party. The patents-in-suit did not center on the '971 Patent.