Defendant

Fisher-Price, Inc.

1 case as defendant.

Cases
1
Active
0
1 closed
Filed
—
Top venue
W.D. Wisconsin
1 case

Company profile

Fisher-Price, Inc. is an American toy manufacturer headquartered in East Aurora, New York. It was founded in 1930 by Herman Fisher, Irving Price, and Helen Schelle, and has been a wholly owned subsidiary of Mattel, Inc. (NASDAQ: MAT) since Mattel's roughly $1 billion acquisition closed in November 1993. The company was previously owned by Quaker Oats (1969–1991) and briefly traded publicly after a 1991 spinoff. Fisher-Price does not report standalone financials or headcount; it is disclosed as one of Mattel's "Power Brands."

Products / operations. Fisher-Price designs and markets infant, toddler, and preschool toys, baby gear, and related products. Major lines include Little People, Laugh & Learn, Imaginext, Power Wheels, Thomas & Friends, and baby-care items such as high chairs, booster seats, jumperoos, bouncers, bassinets, tubs, and potties. Mattel's 2024 filings describe Fisher-Price as a leader in play and child development; the company reported Fisher-Price power-brand gross billings of about $93.4 million in Q1 2024.

Patent-litigation posture. This is an operating company, not an NPE. In the tracked data Fisher-Price appears once, as a defendant and never as a plaintiff — the classic profile of a product company targeted by an outside patent holder rather than an entity asserting an acquired portfolio. The sole tracked venue is the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, not a plaintiff-friendly Eastern District of Texas docket.

Notable case. William A. Clarke v. Fisher-Price, Inc. (W.D. Wis., Judge Shabaz, 2008 — docket summaries render the name "Clark v. Fisher-Price"). The plaintiff, an individual inventor, alleged that Fisher-Price's "Fun To Learn Potty" infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,038,711, covering a toddler potty-training device with a self-standing stool, a tank-like hollow back member, and features to encourage use. The court construed the claims, found infringement of claims 1 and 15 on summary judgment, and left validity disputes for further proceedings. For context, Fisher-Price has also been a party in other toy-patent disputes outside this database, including LeapFrog Enterprises v. Fisher-Price (Fed. Cir. 2007) and Fisher-Price v. Safety 1st (D. Del.).

Sources: Fisher-Price/Mattel press releases and SEC filings (Mattel 10-K/10-Q, 2021–2024), Wikipedia, W.D. Wis. case summaries. Standalone headcount and revenue for Fisher-Price are not publicly disclosed.

William A. Clarke v. Fisher-Price, Inc.

partial summary judgment; final disposition unverified
Docket:
3:07-cv-00421
Patents:6038711

William A. Clarke sued Fisher-Price, Inc. over US 6,038,711, accusing the 'Fun To Learn Potty'. The court granted summary judgment of infringement on claims 1 and 15 in favor of Clarke and denied summary judgment on obviousness, leaving invalidity disputed; final disposition was not verified.