I'll verify the company's profile with a search.
Alkami Technology, Inc. (Nasdaq: ALKT), commonly "Alkami," is a cloud-based digital banking software company headquartered in Plano, Texas (5601 Granite Parkway). It was founded in 2009 and went public on Nasdaq in April 2021; it remains an independent, publicly traded company with no parent. Per its FY2025 Form 10-K, total revenues were $443.6 million (up ~33% from $333.8 million in 2024), with ~1,225 full-time employees; sources list the address as Plano and give employee counts ranging from roughly 900 to 1,225 across reporting dates.
Alkami sells a software-as-a-service "Digital Sales & Service Platform" to U.S. banks and credit unions, primarily community, regional, and super-regional institutions. The platform comprises three solution lines: Onboarding & Account Opening (from its MANTL acquisition), Digital Banking (retail and business online/mobile banking), and Data & Marketing (data-driven personalization and campaign tools, from its Segmint acquisition). It also offers commercial payments and fraud products, notably Positive Pay & ACH Reporting. Roughly 95% of revenue is SaaS subscription services. The 10-K lists about 22.4 million live registered users at year-end 2025. Competitors include Q2 Holdings, Fiserv, and Jack Henry.
Litigation posture: Alkami appears in the tracked data as a defendant only (one case, zero as plaintiff) — the profile of an operating company defending against patent assertion, not a litigant that asserts patents itself.
Notable case: Plano Encryption Technologies, LLC v. Alkami Technology, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-01032-JRG (E.D. Tex., filed Sept. 20, 2016). Plano Encryption Technologies (PET) was a Texas LLC and wholly owned subsidiary of Koba Holdings, LLC, described by Unified Patents and RPX as an NPE; it acquired former Intel patents (e.g., U.S. 5,974,550 and 5,991,399) and ran a single campaign in 2015–2016 against banks, banking-software vendors, and mobile-app operators, filed in the Eastern District of Texas. The Alkami suit was consolidated for pretrial purposes with PET's case against State Farm (2:16-cv-01072) and drew claim-construction rulings from Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The patents were later assigned to Honeyman Cipher Solutions, LLC.