Litigation
American Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al.
affirmed3:06-cv-02433
Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
Patents at issue (4)
Plaintiffs (1)
Summary
Related '355-family litigation in which the patents that went to trial and through final judgment were 6,330,497, 6,438,465, and 6,542,795, not 6,009,355 itself. The district court held those patents unenforceable for inequitable conduct for failure to disclose the 1996 Acura RL navigation system, and the Federal Circuit affirmed in American Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co., 768 F.3d 1185 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).