Litigation
Adapt Pharma Operations Limited et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al.
judgment (invalidity); affirmed on appeal2:16-cv-07721 (JLL)(JAD); 2:17-cv-00864; 2:17-cv-02877; 2:17-cv-05100; 2:18-cv-09880
Auto-generating section 1 of 5: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Filed
- 2016-11-26
- Terminated
- 2020-06-26
Patents at issue (6)
Plaintiffs (4)
Summary
Adapt and Opiant sued Teva in D.N.J. asserting NARCAN naloxone nasal spray patents. The district court found the asserted patents invalid for obviousness on June 5, 2020, with judgment entered June 26, 2020; the Federal Circuit affirmed on Feb. 10, 2022. The '570 patent was not asserted but was cited as prior art (Wyse). Consolidated/related docket numbers included 2:17-cv-00864, 2:17-cv-02877, 2:17-cv-05100, 2:18-cv-09880; related Perrigo action 2:18-cv-15287.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
In the news
What the press has reported about this case, summarized with links to the source articles.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).