Untitled case

This case overview is based on the assumption of a typographical error in the provided patent number. The patent number 10721066 does not yield any relevant results for ownership or litigation. However, a very similar patent, US 11,721,066 B2, titled "3D building model materials auto-populator," has publicly available information. It is possible the provided number was intended to be 11721066.

Assuming the patent at issue is US 11,721,066 B2, the patent describes a system and method for automatic building material ordering. This includes capturing building images, constructing a scaled multi-dimensional building model, extracting dimensions of architectural features, identifying matching manufacturer products, receiving user preferences, automatically populating a selection list, auto-ordering the products, and auto-tracking their delivery to the location. The assignee for this patent is BuildTools, LLC.

As of the current date, May 27, 2026, searches for case number 26-1372 at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have not yielded specific information regarding parties, the accused product, or the procedural posture of a patent infringement litigation, particularly one involving patent 10,721,066 or 11,721,066. The case number indicates a very recent filing in 2026, which may explain the limited public details in general web searches. While general information about the Federal Circuit and its processes is available, no specific docket entries, opinions, or news articles directly link case 26-1372 to a patent dispute or identify the parties involved in such a dispute. Therefore, a detailed overview of the parties, accused products, and the case's notability cannot be provided for this specific appellate case number based on currently available public information.

I need to identify the parties and the underlying district court case for Federal Circuit case 26-1372 before I can detail the litigation history of patent 10721066. My initial search for the Federal Circuit case number did not yield this specific information directly. I will need to use PACER or a similar legal research tool to pinpoint the district court case from which the appeal originates.

Currently, the provided information only indicates that this is an appellate case at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case number 26-1372, involving patent 10721066, with unspecified parties and outcome. Without identifying the district court case, I cannot provide details on the complaint, answer, pre-trial motions, claim construction, discovery, trial, or post-trial motions. I also cannot effectively search for parallel PTAB IPR/PGR proceedings without knowing the parties involved in the district court litigation, as PTAB searches can be filtered by party name.

Therefore, I cannot currently provide a chronological list of key legal developments and outcomes for this patent infringement litigation.My attempts to identify the parties and the underlying district court case for Federal Circuit case 26-1372 have not yet been successful. The search results provided general information about the Federal Circuit's operations and PACER, but no specific details for case 26-1372 itself. Therefore, I cannot yet provide the requested chronological legal developments or outcomes for this patent infringement litigation. I need to find the parties and the district court case number to proceed.My attempts to identify the parties and the underlying district court case for Federal Circuit case 26-1372 have been unsuccessful so far. The initial searches using the Federal Circuit case number primarily returned general information about the court and PACER, or unrelated cases from different circuits or years. Without the names of the appellant and appellee, and the originating district court case number, I cannot accurately detail the legal developments of the patent infringement litigation involving patent 10721066.

Given that today's date is May 27, 2026, and the Federal Circuit case number is 26-1372, it is a very recently filed appeal. Detailed information, such as the parties and the district court case from which it originated, may not yet be widely available through standard public search methods, or may require a more direct PACER search with specific filters that cannot be executed without initial party or court information.

Therefore, I cannot provide a chronological list of key legal developments and outcomes for this patent infringement litigation at this time. I lack the fundamental information about the parties and the district court proceedings.I have been unable to identify the parties or the specific underlying district court case for Federal Circuit case number 26-1372 using direct searches on the Federal Circuit's website and general web searches. The searches have yielded general information about the Federal Circuit and PACER, along with cases from other circuits or different years that share similar numbering patterns. As today's date is May 27, 2026, a case filed with a 2026 Federal Circuit number would be very recent, and its detailed information might not yet be widely indexed or publicly available through standard search methods.

Without the parties' names or the district court case number, I cannot accurately track the litigation history of patent 10721066. Therefore, I cannot provide the requested chronological list of key legal developments including filings, motions, claim construction, discovery, trial events, outcome, or parallel PTAB proceedings for this specific appellate case at this time. I will now attempt to search for litigation involving patent 10721066 in general legal databases, hoping to find a district court case that might eventually lead to the Federal Circuit appeal 26-1372.

Therefore, the key legal developments and outcome for this patent infringement litigation involving patent 10721066 cannot be provided as the foundational information of the parties and the underlying district court case for Federal Circuit appeal 26-1372 remains unidentified.Despite multiple attempts to locate the key legal developments and outcome for Federal Circuit case 26-1372 concerning patent 10721066, the specific parties and the underlying district court case could not be identified through the available public search tools.

Searches for "Federal Circuit case 26-1372," its docket, and opinions, as well as general litigation history for "patent 10721066," did not yield the necessary details to construct a chronological summary of the patent infringement litigation. The results included general information about the Federal Circuit, PACER, and PTAB, but no direct links to the requested case. Given that the case number is from 2026, it is a very recent filing, and comprehensive public records may not yet be readily available through these search avenues.

Therefore, without the identification of the specific litigants and the district court proceedings, a detailed account of the key legal developments, including filings, pre-trial motions, claim construction, discovery, trial events, verdict, post-trial motions, settlement, or any parallel PTAB IPR/PGR proceedings, cannot be provided.

Unfortunately, public records for Federal Circuit case 26-1372, including the names of the parties and their counsel, are not readily available through general web searches as of May 27, 2026. This is often the case for newly filed appeals where an opinion has not yet been issued or key filings have not become widely publicized or indexed by public docket aggregators.

Without direct access to the official PACER docket for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (which typically requires a subscription), it is not possible to identify the specific attorneys of record, their roles, firms, or relevant experience for this particular case at this time. Filings may also be sealed, further restricting public access to this information.

I am unable to identify the counsel of record representing the defendant(s) in CAFC case 26-1372. The parties for this specific appellate case, filed in 2026, are not publicly available through the search capabilities at my disposal. Without knowing the identities of the appellant and appellee, and subsequently which party was the defendant in the underlying district court action, it is not possible to identify their legal representation.

Docket filings for very recent cases may not be immediately indexed by public search engines like Google. A direct search of the PACER system (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) would typically be required to obtain definitive information on parties and counsel for federal court cases, but I do not have direct access to PACER.