Untitled case

The information available from public records does not directly link Federal Circuit case number 24-1705 with U.S. Patent 10,115,067. While searches for Federal Circuit case 24-1705 indicate recent activity, including its appearance as an associated appeal number in BISSELL, INC. v. ITC (which involves different patents related to surface cleaning devices, with a document filed on May 11, 2026), and In Re SONG (a nonprecedential opinion from the PTO, appeal number 25-1705), neither of these cases, nor any others found under the specified case number, are identified as involving U.S. Patent 10,115,067.

U.S. Patent 10,115,067, titled "Brachytherapy device," was originally assigned to PROXIMA THERAPEUTICS, INC. The patent generally describes assemblies, devices, systems, and methods for treating tissue adjacent to a body cavity, such as a cavity formed by the removal of tissue from a patient. More specifically, it pertains to a brachytherapy device designed to facilitate such tissue treatment, configured for use in a system with a fluid source, and incorporating an inner balloon assembly.

Due to the absence of a direct link in publicly available information between Federal Circuit case 24-1705 and patent 10,115,067, details regarding the specific parties involved, the accused product, the underlying district court, or any notable aspects of this particular patent infringement litigation cannot be provided for this case number and patent combination. It is possible the patent is involved in litigation under a different case number, or that case 24-1705 does not involve patent 10,115,067 as an asserted patent.

Federal Circuit Case 24-1705: Unable to Identify Specific Litigation Details for Patent 10115067

As of June 26, 2026, a thorough search of publicly available dockets and legal news for U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) case number 24-1705, in conjunction with U.S. Patent No. 10,115,067, has not yielded specific information regarding the key legal developments and outcome of a patent infringement litigation. The provided case caption, "Untitled case," further complicates direct identification through standard search methods.

Initial searches for CAFC case 24-1705 primarily refer to "25-1705: In Re SONG," a nonprecedential opinion issued on February 18, 2026, which is a different case number. There are no readily available public records that directly link Federal Circuit case 24-1705 to patent 10,115,067 or an "Untitled case" caption through the performed searches.

Without a definitive connection between the Federal Circuit appeal number 24-1705 and patent 10,115,067, or an identifiable underlying district court litigation, it is not possible to provide a chronological list of legal developments, including filings, motions, claim construction, discovery, trial events, or parallel PTAB proceedings specific to this "Untitled case" and patent. Public records generally require more specific identifiers, such as party names or a clear case title, to trace the full litigation history.

I am unable to identify the counsel of record representing the plaintiff(s) in CAFC Case 24-1705, nor can I confirm the case name or the specific parties involved, based on the current search capabilities.

Multiple attempts to find the docket for CAFC Case 24-1705, specifically in relation to Patent 10115067, have not yielded direct results. Search outcomes often refer to different case numbers (e.g., 25-1705, 24-2107, 24-1396, 23-1494, 23-1512, 22-1925, 23-2437) or provide general information about Federal Circuit patent appeals.

Accessing the specific docket entries for CAFC Case 24-1705 through PACER would be necessary to identify the parties (appellant and appellee) and their respective counsel. Since direct PACER access is not available, and public web searches have not revealed this specific information, I cannot proceed with identifying the plaintiff's counsel, their firms, or their litigation experience.

The requested information regarding the counsel of record for the defendant(s) in Federal Circuit case 24-1705, pertaining to patent 10,115,067, cannot be identified.

A thorough review of publicly available records indicates a significant discrepancy with the provided case metadata. While the prompt specifies the "Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit," searches for case number 24-1705 predominantly lead to a case titled "Charles River Laboratories International, Inc." with an opinion summary dated August 15, 2025, which is associated with the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, not the Federal Circuit.

Furthermore, as noted in the previously generated sections of this case summary, initial searches for Federal Circuit case 24-1705 primarily refer to "25-1705: In Re SONG," a nonprecedential opinion issued on February 18, 2026, which is a different case number entirely and involves a patent application rejection rather than an infringement litigation for U.S. Patent No. 10,115,067.

Due to the absence of any public record directly linking Federal Circuit case number 24-1705 to U.S. Patent No. 10,115,067 or an identifiable patent infringement case with parties and counsel, it is not possible to provide details about the defendant's legal representation. The case number provided appears to be either incorrect for a Federal Circuit patent infringement case involving patent 10,115,067 or pertains to a case with sealed filings not publicly disclosed.