Patent litigation attorney
Timothy Devlin
17 tracked appearances — 17 plaintiff · 0 defendant.
Specialty & background
I'll research Timothy Devlin's professional background before drafting the summary.
Let me verify specific case outcomes and any Federal Circuit activity.
Now let me check his Federal Circuit record and other tracked cases.
Timothy Devlin — Patent Litigation Practice Summary
Specialty / focus areas. Devlin is a technology-focused patent litigator whose docket is concentrated in electrical and computer-arts subject matter: wireless and cellular messaging (HBCU Messaging US LP v. Apple, concerning SMS/packet-switched messaging architecture), networking and data-center infrastructure (Umbra Technologies v. Zscaler), semiconductors and wafer processing (Greenthread Ltd. v. Monolithic Power Systems; Ocean Semiconductor matters), and consumer electronics/app-based financial services. The tracked matters also show work in automotive components (Vision Works IP Corp. v. Subaru of America) and short-range/connected-device systems (IoT Innovations v. Somfy Systems), while his published representative cases extend to contact lenses, enterprise network security, and optical wafer inspection. Firm materials describe broader coverage including medical devices, chemical processes, and mechanical components, and describe him as working across "virtually all areas of technology."
Side preference. The tracked data show a strongly plaintiff-side practice: 17 of 17 appearances are on the plaintiff/patent-owner side, roughly 14 of them as lead counsel and one as local counsel. That profile is consistent with a patent-owner enforcement practice, including representation of NPE/PAE-style plaintiffs and small technology companies against large operating companies. His own firm biography and representative-case list, however, indicate meaningful defense-side experience as well (for example, representation of DuBois in Ecolab Inc. v. DuBois, reported as producing non-infringement verdicts on all patents in suit, and of ADE Corporation in ADE Corp. v. KLA-Tencor, reported as an invalidity verdict), so the tracked plaintiff skew should be read as a snapshot of the matters captured in this dataset rather than as an exclusive-side practice.
Firm context. Devlin is the managing partner of Devlin Law Firm LLC, a Wilmington, Delaware IP boutique (his appearances also appear under the variant name "The Devlin Law Firm"). Before founding the firm he was a principal at Fish & Richardson PC, where he served as a co-chair of its IP Risk Management Group. He has been Delaware-admitted since 2002.
Notable cases and outcomes. Among tracked matters, HBCU Messaging US LP v. Apple (W.D. Tex.) is the highest-profile active campaign; Apple has filed a series of IPRs against the asserted messaging patents (including IPR2025-01488 and IPR2026-00104/-00105/-00107/-00109), and Devlin is counsel of record for the patent owner in those proceedings. Separately, in Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Stellar, LLC, Devlin (with Jason Shapiro and Jim Lennon) represented patent owner Stellar in four IPRs (IPR2024-01284/-01285/-01313/-01314); after the Board instituted, Stellar obtained Director Review, and in a March 2025 order Acting Director Coke Morgan Stewart vacated the institution decisions and denied institution on Fintiv grounds — a result widely covered in the patent bar press and later confirmed on rehearing. Earlier reported results include plaintiff-side infringement/validity verdicts in Rembrandt Vision Technologies v. Ciba Vision and Deep Nines v. McAfee.
PTAB / IPR experience. Yes — he appears regularly as patent-owner counsel in AIA trials, dating back at least to IPR2017-00212 (Digital Audio Encoding Technologies) and including lead-counsel designation in IPR2021-01344 (Applied Materials v. Ocean Semiconductor). He also has Federal Circuit experience, including oral argument for appellants in In Re Hera Wireless S.A. (Fed. Cir. 2021, nonprecedential affirmance of IPR2018-01700 et seq.).
Bar / education. Admitted in New York (1997) and Delaware (2002) and registered before the USPTO (Reg. No. 41,706); J.D., University of Michigan Law School, 1996 (with honors); B.S. in physics and mathematics, Penn State University, 1993. (Bar dates per Martindale/Super Lawyers; firm bio lists only Delaware and USPTO admissions.)
Caveats: The "200+ lead counsel" figure and several representative-case outcomes above come from the firm's own biography and should be treated as firm-published rather than independently adjudicated. Case names listed as "Untitled" in the source data were not resolvable and have been omitted from the outcomes discussion.
Firms
Roles
- lead counsel10
- Lead Counsel4
- counsel2
- Local Counsel1
Cases (17)
- π plaintiffContext Directions, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Devlin Law Firm · lead counsel
- π plaintiffCyberfone Systems, LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al.The Devlin Law Firm · counsel
- π plaintiffExpress Mobile, Inc. v. GoDaddy.com, LLCDevlin Law Firm · Local Counsel
- π plaintiffGreenthread Ltd v. Monolithic Power Systems IncThe Devlin Law Firm · lead counsel
- π plaintiffHBCU Messaging US LP v. Apple Inc.Devlin Law Firm · counsel
- π plaintiffHBCU Messaging US LP v. Apple Inc. et al.Devlin Law Firm · lead counsel
- π plaintiffIoT Innovations LLC v. Somfy Systems, Inc. et al.Devlin Law Firm · lead counsel
- π plaintiffTurboCode LLC v. Ceragon Networks, Inc.Devlin Law Firm · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUmbra Technologies Ltd. v. Zscaler, Inc.Devlin Law Firm · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDevlin Law Firm · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDevlin Law Firm · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDevlin Law Firm · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDevlin Law Firm · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDevlin Law Firm · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDevlin Law Firm · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDevlin Law Firm · lead counsel
- π plaintiffVision Works IP Corp. v. Subaru of America, Inc.Devlin Law Firm · lead counsel