Patent litigation attorney

Thomas M. Fisher

1 tracked appearance 0 plaintiff · 1 defendant.

Specialty & background

Summary: Thomas M. Fisher (K&L Gates, Of Counsel)

Specialty / focus areas. The authoritative case list attributes one tracked matter to Thomas M. Fisher, with K&L Gates listed as his firm and his role as of counsel. The case is untitled, so the technology area cannot be confirmed from the tracked data, and publicly available sources do not clearly identify a Thomas M. Fisher practicing patent litigation at K&L Gates. Web research surfaced several same-named attorneys — including Thomas J. Fisher (Cozen O'Connor, electrical/software patent litigator) and Thomas Michael Fisher (Fisher Patent Group, Hickory, NC) — but neither profile matches the K&L Gates affiliation. No verified practice description for this specific Thomas M. Fisher could be located.

Side preference / firm context. The single tracked appearance is on the defendant side (1 defendant appearance, 0 plaintiff appearances), which suggests his tracked work involves defending accused infringers rather than asserting patents for NPEs/PAEs. That pattern is consistent with defense-side patent litigation work typical of an of-counsel role, but it is a thin basis for generalization given the one-case dataset. His current firm is K&L Gates; no prior firms relevant to a patent litigation career could be verified through available sources.

Notable cases / outcomes. No tracked case is identified by name, and I could not verify any notable verdicts, Federal Circuit appeals, or settlements for a Thomas M. Fisher associated with K&L Gates. PTAB / IPR experience likewise cannot be confirmed; the search results do not establish regular appearances in IPR/PGR proceedings for this individual. Bar / education: not reliably sourced for this specific attorney — the only education/bar details found online belong to other attorneys sharing the same name, so none are included here.

Bottom line. The profile rests on a single defendant-side tracked appearance as of counsel at K&L Gates. Because the case is untitled and web-accessible records do not corroborate a patent litigation practice for a Thomas M. Fisher at that firm, the remaining details (specialty, outcomes, PTAB activity, credentials) are unverified and should be treated as such unless additional firm or court records are provided.

Firms

Roles

  • of counsel1

Cases (1)