Patent litigation attorney
Stephen E. Sward
1 tracked appearance — 0 plaintiff · 1 defendant.
Specialty & background
A comprehensive professional summary for Stephen E. Sward, specifically in the context of patent litigation, is challenging to construct due to limited publicly available information. Web searches for a patent litigation attorney named Stephen E. Sward at DLA Piper do not readily yield a dedicated professional biography or firm profile detailing such a practice. Searches primarily return information for a different attorney named Stephen E. Sward, whose professional background focuses on insurance defense, products liability, civil rights, and general civil litigation, primarily at the firm Rooks, Pitts and Poust, which later merged with DLA Piper. This other Stephen E. Sward was admitted to the Illinois bar in 1965 and received a B.S. in 1963 and an LL.B. in 1965 from the University of Illinois.
Based solely on the provided authoritative case list, Stephen E. Sward is noted for a single appearance in patent litigation. In this instance, he acted as presumed Lead Counsel for the defendant, Lexmark International, Inc., in the case of MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC v. Lexmark International, Inc. This indicates a preference for defending operating companies against patent assertions.
Given Lexmark's business, this appearance suggests involvement in patent disputes related to imaging, printing, or associated software and technology. However, without further verifiable information from firm profiles or legal news, a broader characterization of his specific technology focus areas, other notable cases or outcomes, or experience with PTAB/IPR proceedings cannot be reliably sourced for the patent litigation attorney Stephen E. Sward.
Firms
Roles
- Lead Counsel (presumed)1
Cases (1)
- Δ defendantMPHJ Technology Investments, LLC v. Lexmark International, Inc.DLA Piper · Lead Counsel (presumed)