Scott H. Sirich

I'll research this attorney's background and practice.

Summary — Scott H. Sirich

Specialty / focus areas. The authoritative case list contains a single tracked patent matter for this attorney: Rare Breed Triggers Inc. et al. v. Orion Arms Corp. (pled and docketed as ABC IP LLC et al. v. Orion Arms Corp d/b/a Orion Wholesale), a mechanical-arts patent case concerning forced-reset firearm trigger mechanisms. The asserted patents (U.S. Pat. Nos. 12,038,247 and 12,031,784, with related earlier patents in the same family) cover AR‑pattern trigger assemblies. There is no tracked evidence of practice in Wi‑Fi/standards, pharmaceutical, or software patent litigation.

Side preference. The tracked data shows one appearance, on the defendant side (0 plaintiff / 1 defendant). One data point is not enough to establish a side preference; on the record available, he appears as defense-side counsel rather than as an NPE/PAE plaintiff's lawyer.

Firm context. The tracked entry lists him as of counsel at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP. This is the only firm associated with him in the case data.

Notable case. Rare Breed Triggers / ABC IP v. Orion Arms is part of a large, well-documented enforcement campaign. According to Bloomberg Law, Rare Breed and exclusive licensee ABC IP had filed at least 131 forced-reset-trigger suits since May 2025, following a DOJ settlement that obligated Rare Breed to enforce its patents. The Orion Arms action was filed in the S.D. Ind. (4:26-cv-00032), stayed pending JPML proceedings, and transferred into MDL No. 3176 in the E.D. Tex. (4:26-cv-01110) in August 2026. Reports indicate overlapping validity, claim-construction, customer-suit, and inequitable-conduct issues, with counterclaims/disputes involving Sherman Act and tortious-interference theories — but no outcome specific to Sirich's client is verifiable from public sources.

PTAB / IPR experience. No IPR, PGR, or other PTAB appearances by this attorney were found in the sources reviewed; I cannot confirm any.

Bar / education. Not reliably sourced for the Bradley Arant attorney, so omitted.

Important caveat on identity. Web searches for "Scott H. Sirich" return a different practitioner of the same name: Scott H. Sirich, a long-time partner at Plunkett Cooney in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan (Wayne State University Law School, J.D. 1992; University of Michigan, B.A. 1989; Michigan bar, 1992), whose practice is construction law, architect/engineer liability, and insurance defense — not patent litigation. I found no firm bio, court opinion, or news item confirming a Bradley Arant attorney named Scott H. Sirich practicing patent litigation. The two should not be conflated, and any practice-profile assertions about the Bradley Arant attorney beyond the single tracked case should be treated as unverified.