Scott B. Zolke

I'll research this attorney before drafting.

Scott B. Zolke — patent litigation practice summary

Focus areas. The tracked federal docket footprint is a single matter: Trinity Info Media, LLC v. The League App, Inc., a patent case brought by an NPE against a dating-app operator and part of a C.D. Cal. campaign (parallel suits in the same period include Trinity Info Media v. Raya App, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-01361, pleaded as willful patent infringement, per RPX). The asserted technology in that campaign involves software/mobile-app functionality rather than Wi-Fi standards, pharma, or mechanical arts — nothing in the available record shows a broader technology specialty. Notably, the public profile for the Loeb & Loeb attorney named Scott B. Zolke describes a media, entertainment, sports, and intellectual property practice (media rights, sponsorship/naming rights, branding, licensing, name-and-likeness), with IP litigation listed only as a peer-review category — not a patent litigation practice. That gap should be confirmed before relying on this appearance as evidence of a patent-litigation specialty.

Side preference. One tracked appearance, on the plaintiff side, with no tracked defendant-side appearances. Given the single data point, this is best described as an isolated plaintiff-side entry rather than a demonstrated NPE/PAE prosecution practice or an operating-company defense practice.

Firm context. Currently a partner at Loeb & Loeb LLP in Los Angeles. Earlier in his career he worked at Heenan Blaikie A California Professional Corporation, an entertainment/IP and civil litigation practice, so his career center of gravity is transactional and litigation work in media and IP rather than patent litigation.

Notable cases, PTAB, and credentials. No verdicts, Federal Circuit arguments, or settlement results in the patent context could be verified for this attorney, and no IPR/PGR filings were found in which he appears. The most prominent matter connected to the tracked appearance is the Trinity Info Media campaign itself; the same plaintiff's related litigation (Trinity Info Media v. Covalent) is known to have produced a Section 101 patent-eligibility ruling on appeal, but I could not verify any participation by this attorney in it. Bar admissions reported are California (1988), Illinois (1980), and Georgia (1984); education is a J.D. from the University of Miami School of Law and a B.S. from Georgia Institute of Technology. He is not listed as registered to practice before the USPTO.

Disambiguation note. Sources should be read carefully: the Loeb & Loeb partner matching this name is a long-admitted media/entertainment/sports and IP lawyer, and his name is close to (but distinct from) IP litigator Martin M. Zollick. The single patent-docket appearance above may reflect limited or screening-level involvement rather than a standalone patent practice, and that should be verified against the docket before the profile is used in a pitch or conflicts context.