Patent litigation attorney
Sarita Venkat
8 tracked appearances — 2 plaintiff · 6 defendant.
Specialty & background
Specialty / focus. Sarita Venkat's tracked docket is almost entirely software- and networking-focused patent litigation on behalf of Cisco: network security (firewalls, threat-intelligence-driven packet filtering), routing/switching and SDN, Ethernet ring protection switching (ITU-T G.8032), and optical transport (ROADM/WDM ring networks). She also has life-sciences exposure from earlier in-house roles, but the tracked cases are uniformly high-tech. Her public profile (ChIPs, Concurrences, Sedona Conference) describes her current remit as IP, commercial, and antitrust litigation, consistent with that docket.
Side preference. Six of her eight tracked appearances are defendant-side, defending Cisco as an operating company against NPE/competitor assertions (Optimnet, Centripetal, Velocity Communications, Palo Alto Networks-related proceedings). Her two plaintiff-side entries are Cisco's own assertion against Damaka Inc. and an appearance in Unified Patents v. Golden Eye Technologies LLC, so she works almost exclusively for large operating-company clients rather than for PAEs.
Firm context / notable cases. Venkat is career in-house: VP & Deputy General Counsel, Global Litigation & Competition at Cisco (now listed as SVP, Corporate Legal Affairs), after roles at Apple (head of global IP transactions), ServiceNow, and Abbott Laboratories; no private-firm practice was found. Her signature matter is Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (E.D. Va.): a 22-day bench trial yielded a roughly $2.75 billion willful-infringement judgment against Cisco in 2020, which the Federal Circuit vacated on judicial-recusal grounds; after remand, a new judge found noninfringement in December 2023, and the district court declined a third trial in June 2024. The Optimnet v. Cisco suit (E.D. Tex., filed Sept. 2025) remains pending, with Cisco filing IPR challenges to the asserted patents.
PTAB / IPR experience. Venkat's portfolio includes substantial IPR strategy: in Centripetal, Cisco petitioned for IPR on nine of eleven asserted patents and obtained a stay, and the PTAB invalidated claims in the Centripetal portfolio; in Optimnet, Cisco has pursued IPRs such as IPR2026-00321. The Unified Patents appearance also suggests PTAB exposure, though her personal role there could not be verified.
Bar / education. Registered patent attorney admitted in Illinois, California, and before the USPTO; holds a B.S. in biology (per ChIPs profile). Her law school was not identified in the sources reviewed.
Firms
Roles
- in-house4
- in-house counsel2
- In-house counsel1
- VP & Deputy General Counsel of Global Litigation1
Cases (8)
- Δ defendantCentripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.VP & Deputy General Counsel of Global Litigation
- Δ defendantCentripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al.Cisco Systems, Inc. · In-house counsel
- π plaintiffCisco Systems Inc v. Damaka Incin-house
- Δ defendantOptimnet LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Golden Eye Technologies LLCin-house counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled casein-house counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled casein-house
- Δ defendantVelocity Communication Technologies, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.in-house