Patent litigation attorney
S. Austin Ginnings
1 tracked appearance — 1 plaintiff · 0 defendant.
Specialty & background
I'll research this attorney before writing.
Let me dig deeper — there may be a name/identity issue.
Summary — S. Austin Ginnings
Specialty / focus. Ginnings is a registered patent attorney whose practice spans patent litigation, prosecution, and IP due diligence. His firm biography describes litigation work across consumer electronics, hardware and software products, cloud-based systems, video streaming platforms, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices — a mixed electrical/software and life-sciences portfolio rather than a single-technical-area practice. His technical background is bioengineering (B.S., Rice University), and his early work at Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto and Desmarais LLP is described as covering electronics, computer software, networking, communications, telecommunications, and pharmaceutical clients. Note: the tracked case list contains only an untitled plaintiff-side matter, so technology-specific conclusions here rest on his published practice description, not on verifiable docket activity.
Side preference. The structured data records a single tracked appearance, on the plaintiff side, as lead counsel (1 plaintiff / 0 defendant), which on its face suggests representation of patent owners rather than a steady defense practice. That single data point is too thin to establish a side preference, and his published record — representing both electronics and pharma companies in district court, the ITC, and the Patent Office — reads as a mixed plaintiff/defendant practice. Treat the plaintiff-heavy count as a sample-size artifact rather than a profile.
Firm context and a sourcing caveat. His verified current affiliation is Nelson Bumgardner Conroy P.C. (Orland Park, Illinois), where he is a partner. Before that he was at Desmarais LLP (2016–2019) and Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto (2011–2016), with an intervening stint in the litigation finance industry investing in and collecting on patent, trade secret, false advertising, and antitrust claims. The tracked data attributes his appearance to Gillam & Smith LLP (Marshall/Tyler, Texas), but I could not corroborate any Ginnings association with that firm; searches of Gillam & Smith filings and attorney rosters surfaced no Ginnings name, and his own bio states he is "not licensed to practice in Texas." The Gillam & Smith attribution should therefore be treated as unverified and possibly a data error. There is no indication he is in-house.
Notable cases, PTAB/IPR, and credentials. No case name, verdict, settlement, or Federal Circuit outcome can be verified for Ginnings from public sources; the only tracked matter is untitled, and I found no reported trial results or appeal decisions naming him. His firm biography states he has handled Patent Office proceedings — including inter partes reviews, covered business method reviews, and reexaminations — as well as ITC Section 337 investigations, arbitrations, and appeals, but I could not confirm specific IPR/CBM proceeding numbers listing him as counsel, so IPR regularity should be characterized as claimed rather than verified. Bar and education: admitted in New York (2012) and Illinois (2023), registered with the USPTO (2008), and admitted to the S.D.N.Y., E.D. Tex., W.D. Tex., the E.D. Mich., and the Federal Circuit; B.S. Bioengineering, Rice University (2007) and J.D., George Washington University Law School (2011), where he was a Notes Editor of the Federal Circuit Bar Journal and clerked for Commissioner Deanna Tanner Okun at the ITC.
Caveat: this profile rests on firm/bar directory listings (Nelson Bumgardner Conroy, Martindale, US News) and does not include independently verified litigation outcomes.
Firms
Roles
- lead counsel1
Cases (1)
- π plaintiffUntitled caseGillam & Smith · lead counsel