Patent litigation attorney

Richard C. Lin

1 tracked appearance 0 plaintiff · 1 defendant.

Specialty & background

Richard C. Lin is a seasoned patent litigation attorney at Bunsow De Mory LLP, with over two decades of experience representing clients in complex intellectual property disputes. His practice spans a diverse range of technologies, including wireless communications systems, data management software, artificial intelligence, medical devices, biopharmaceuticals, power converter technology, flash memory, and blockchain-related innovations. Mr. Lin brings a robust technical background to his litigation work, drawing on his firm's emphasis on legal and technical expertise to handle intricate technological issues.

While the provided case data lists an appearance for the defendant in Shenzhen Qianfenyi Intelligent Technology Co Ltd. v. Wacom Co Ltd., Mr. Lin's broader practice demonstrates significant experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants. He has secured favorable outcomes for plaintiffs, including a $9.25 million jury verdict in a patent infringement action involving automated pricing systems and a favorable settlement on the eve of trial in a database management system case. He has also obtained verdicts of infringement and favorable settlements for patent owners in cases involving power converter technology. His representative matters also include defending clients in patent infringement actions related to various high-tech fields.

Mr. Lin is actively involved in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings as a registered patent attorney. He represents parties in Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings and has been noted as a key attorney in his firm's PTAB practice. Notably, he successfully defeated a Tesla IPR petition at the institution stage for his client, Relink US LLC, and has handled IPRs involving blockchain patents. He earned his J.D. from Harvard Law School in 2000 and holds a B.S. in Biology (1997) and an A.B. in Psychology (1996) with Distinction from Stanford University. He is admitted to practice in California and before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Firms

Roles

  • Counsel1

Cases (1)