Patent litigation attorney
Paulina Starostka
9 tracked appearances — 2 plaintiff · 7 defendant.
Specialty & background
Paulina Starostka is an intellectual property litigation attorney at DLA Piper LLP (US), where her practice focuses on high-stakes intellectual property litigation, particularly Section 337 investigations before the International Trade Commission. She has experience representing clients on both the plaintiff and defendant sides, though her tracked appearances indicate a primary emphasis on defense work, with six defendant-side roles compared to two plaintiff-side roles. Starostka has been recognized as a "Top 100 Overall Best-Performing ITC Attorney Representing Respondents" by Patexia.
Her practice spans a broad range of industries and technologies, including mobile electronic devices and chipsets, software, LED lighting devices, consumer goods, solar, automotive, and medical devices. Notable engagements include her work as defense counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in cases such as Maxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SoftView, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. In the Maxell litigation, DLA Piper represented Samsung against claims of willful infringement of patents related to smart device technologies, which initially resulted in a substantial jury verdict against Samsung, later overturned by a federal court. In SoftView, she served as Support Counsel in a patent infringement case concerning mobile internet content display.
Starostka regularly represents clients in federal district court and in proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Her experience includes all phases of litigation, from pre-suit diligence and discovery to expert discovery, motions practice, trial preparation, and appeals.
She earned her J.D. with honors from George Washington University Law School and holds a B.S. in Neuroscience from the University of Michigan. Starostka is admitted to practice in Illinois and the District of Columbia.
Firms
Roles
- Counsel4
- associate1
- Support Counsel1
- Associate1
Cases (9)
- Δ defendantMaxell Ltd. v. OO Electronics Co LTD et al.DLA Piper · Counsel
- Δ defendantMaxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.DLA Piper · associate
- Δ defendantSoftView, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.DLA Piper · Support Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDLA Piper · Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseDLA Piper (US) · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDLA Piper · Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseDLA Piper
- Δ defendantUntitled caseDLA Piper
- Δ defendantUntitled caseDLA Piper · Associate