Naveed S. Hasan

I'll research this attorney before drafting the summary.

Let me verify a few specifics on the tracked cases and his PTAB footprint.

Two more checks: the Malikie/Key Patent Innovations campaign and his PTAB/IPR docket.

Naveed S. Hasan is a patent litigator in the Washington, D.C. office of Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP (RJLF), where the firm has announced his promotion to Counsel (he previously held an Associate and, per the tracked docket, an Of Counsel designation). His practice centers on complex patent disputes with a computer-science orientation: his RJLF bio and firm announcements list audio/video streaming and content delivery, AdTech, FinTech, cloud computing and databases, AI/machine learning, GPU processing and parallel architectures, blockchain, LiDAR, augmented/virtual reality, image processing, display and timing-signal circuitry, robotics, bioinformatics, and medical devices. His tracked matters line up with that: digital-video and content-delivery patents for VideoLabs/VL Collective IP, and former BlackBerry wireless and cryptography patents for Malikie Innovations/Key Patent Innovations — including IEEE 802.11-related LDPC coding and touchscreen/UI patents, and ECC cryptography asserted against Bitcoin miners.

Side of the "v." — his tracked appearances skew patent-owner/plaintiff (3 of 4). He has represented VideoLabs, Inc. and VL Collective IP LLC as plaintiffs against Netflix and Meta, and Malikie Innovations Ltd./Key Patent Innovations Ltd. as plaintiffs in EDTX/NDTX/WDTX actions against defendants including Acer, Asus, Match, and Bumble, plus the 2025 Core Scientific and MARA Holdings bitcoin-mining suits. The single defendant-side tracked entry is the Netflix–VideoLabs dispute, where his role was on the VideoLabs patent-owner team in the Federal Circuit appeals arising from Netflix's IPRs. He has not been a primary defense counsel for operating companies in the tracked record.

Notable work. His firm bio credits him as a member of the RJLF team that secured a $525 million jury verdict for Kove IO against Amazon Web Services (N.D. Ill., April 2024; reported in Law360's "Legal Lions" list and firm press releases; the firm's later promotion announcement refers to a $673 million judgment in the same matter) and an $84 million willful-infringement verdict for Cirba/Densify against VMware. In the VideoLabs matters, he was part of the patent-owner team in the Netflix IPRs and the subsequent appeals: the Federal Circuit affirmed PTAB final written decisions invalidating VideoLabs' U.S. Patent 7,440,559 ('559) and 7,233,790 ('790) (VL Collective IP, LLC v. Netflix, Inc., No. 25-1132, Aug. 10, 2026; VideoLabs, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc., No. 25-1131, Rule 36 judgment, May 12, 2026). He is also on the Malikie/Core Scientific team in EDTX (No. 2:25-cv-00519), which substituted Courtland Reichman as lead counsel in 2026.

PTAB/IPR practice is a core part of his docket. He appears as counsel of record in numerous inter partes reviews — including as lead counsel substituted into pending IPRs (e.g., IPR2023-00628) — and his bio notes extensive post-grant experience across IPRs, reissue examination, and ex parte reexamination, plus Federal Circuit appeals and appellate support. He has written on IPR estoppel (AIPLA's New Matter, Winter 2025, discussing Ingenico v. IOENGINE). Bar/education: J.D., Pace Law School (2011); B.S. Computer Science, George Mason University (2005); admitted in Virginia, the District of Columbia, the Federal Circuit, and the USPTO (Reg. No. 72,688). One caveat worth verifying: an earlier RJLF office-expansion announcement carried a footnote that the attorney's practice was supervised by licensed firm members, while his current bio and 2024 EDTX appearances list full bar admissions — I could not independently confirm the date his admissions became effective. His pre-RJLF private-practice history and specific USPTO role are not well documented in available public sources.