Patent litigation attorney
Michael Renaud
6 tracked appearances — 5 plaintiff · 1 defendant.
Specialty & background
Michael T. Renaud — Patent Litigation Practice Summary
Michael T. Renaud is a Boston-based Member of Mintz and chair of the firm's Intellectual Property Division (also a member of its Policy Committee). His practice is concentrated on high-stakes patent enforcement and monetization across semiconductors/GPU technology, telecommunications and network software, embedded microprocessors, cellular devices, e-commerce, and voice-recognition software, with a particularly deep Section 337 practice before the International Trade Commission (ITC). Mintz describes him as a leader of its semiconductor and ITC work; Patexia has ranked him among the most active ITC complainant attorneys.
The tracked docket skews clearly to the plaintiff/enforcement side (5 of 6 appearances), largely for patent-owner monetization clients — Parus Holdings (voice-command/speech-recognition patents asserted against Microsoft, Samsung, and Google in W.D. Tex.) and RealTime Data (data-compression patents against Acronis in D. Mass.) — as well as for operating companies such as AMD. He also takes defense-side work, including a notable ITC defense for Juul Labs, and his practice description emphasizes representing both patent owners and accused infringers. Renaud joined Mintz after practicing at Pepper Hamilton and has spent his career in Boston-based IP litigation.
Most prominent matters: he led AMD's ITC enforcement against LG/VIZIO/MediaTek/Sigma Designs (Inv. 337-TA-1044, 2018) and the later AMD v. TCL/Realtek GPU dispute, which ended in ITC limited exclusion and cease-and-desist orders blocking infringing TCL smart TVs (2024–2025), followed by a favorable Customs enforcement settlement. He also led Juul Labs' ITC defense against Altria/NJOY vaporizer patents, where the full Commission affirmed a non-infringement finding (an Am Law Litigation Daily "Litigator of the Week Runner-Up" honor). The Parus and RealTime cases each ran alongside coordinated IPRs — Google (IPR2022-00523) and Samsung (IPR2022-01502) challenged the Parus patents, and Acronis filed IPRs against the RealTime patents — with Renaud's team defending the patents in those reviews; the RealTime v. Acronis case ended in a stipulated dismissal with prejudice in January 2024. One caveat: in late October 2025, former client Parus filed a malpractice suit in W.D. Tex. naming Mintz, Renaud, and colleague Michael McNamara, after Mintz sued Parus for roughly $2 million in unpaid success fees; those disputes are pending and unrelated to the litigation outcomes above.
Renaud is a USPTO-registered patent attorney (Reg. No. 44,299) admitted in Massachusetts (1996) and Connecticut (1997); he holds a B.S.M.E. from Duke University and a J.D. from the University of Connecticut School of Law (1996).
Firms
Roles
- Lead Counsel2
- trial counsel1
- lead counsel1
- co-counsel1
Cases (6)
- π plaintiffGoogle LLC v. Parus Holdings, Inc.Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo
- π plaintiffParus Holdings, Inc. v. Google LLCMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo · co-counsel
- π plaintiffParus Holdings, Inc. v. Microsoft CorporationMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo · trial counsel
- π plaintiffParus Holdings, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al.Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo · lead counsel
- π plaintiffRealTime Data, LLC v. AcronisMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo · Lead Counsel