Patent litigation attorney
Melissa R. Smith
63 tracked appearances — 13 plaintiff · 50 defendant.
Specialty & background
I'll research this attorney's professional background before drafting.
Good initial results. Let me dig into notable outcomes and PTAB experience.
Let me verify her firm bio and PTAB/IPR activity.
Melissa R. Smith — Patent Litigation Practice Summary
Focus areas. Smith's patent practice is concentrated in the Eastern District of Texas (Marshall and Tyler), where she handles a broad technology mix rather than a single niche. Representative subject matter in her tracked matters includes cellular/LTE and declared standard-essential patents (Optis v. Apple; Malikie Innovations v. Samsung; CM HK and Massively Broadband v. Samsung; Atlas Global v. Dell), consumer electronics and wearables (Ingeniospec v. Apple; HandsFree Labs v. Skechers; Mimzi v. Samsung), automotive infotainment and telematics (AutoConnect v. Hyundai and v. Volkswagen; Autonavigare v. Toyota; Nissan v. Longhorn), semiconductor and networking patents (Greenthread v. OmniVision; Valtrus v. FedEx; Palisade Technologies v. T-Mobile/Micron), and streaming/software patents (Multimedia Technologies v. Fandango and v. Tubi; Personalized Media Communications v. Google; Qomplx v. Palo Alto Networks). She also has trial experience outside pure patent work, including a 2021 defense verdict for Sony in a video-game-feature patent case (with Erise IP) and a 2021 defense verdict for Activision in a high-profile copyright trial.
Side preference. Her tracked docket skews heavily toward the defense: roughly 50 defendant-side appearances versus 13 plaintiff-side, with most roles designated local counsel or co-counsel. The defendant work is almost entirely on behalf of large operating companies (Apple, Samsung, Microsoft, Dell, Google, T-Mobile, Nokia, Toyota, Hyundai, Volkswagen, Charter, FedEx), typically as the East Texas local-counsel anchor for out-of-state lead firms. She does maintain a smaller plaintiff-side practice for patent owners and assertion entities, including Disintermediation Services, HandsFree Labs, Fast IP, and Palisade Technologies — the latter being one of the few tracked matters where she is identified as lead counsel.
Firm context and notable matters. Smith is a partner at Gillam & Smith, LLP in Marshall, Texas, where she has practiced alongside Harry "Gil" Gillam since 1997; the two founded the partnership in 2004. No prior firm history is reflected in the available sources. Her most prominent tracked matter is the long-running Optis Cellular/Wireless v. Apple LTE litigation: after prior East Texas verdicts of $506 million and $300 million were vacated, she was part of the WilmerHale-led trial team that obtained a defense non-infringement verdict for Apple in the third trial, a result covered by Am Law's Litigation Daily. Other reported wins include the T-Mobile/Nokia defense verdict in the Daingean matter (with McKool Smith) and the Alexsam v. Gap defense verdict. She is also frequently credited as local counsel on Kirkland & Ellis and WilmerHale trial teams, and industry case-volume surveys have repeatedly ranked her among the most active patent litigators in the country.
PTAB/IPR and credentials. Smith appears in PTAB records as counsel in inter partes review proceedings, generally in support of the same clients and litigation she handles in district court (for example, the Pantech Wireless IPR series and the Palisade Technologies/Micron IPR filings), but the available sources do not indicate she serves as lead PTAB practitioner. She was admitted to the Texas bar in 1997 (State Bar No. 24001351) and is admitted in the Eastern, Northern, Southern, and Western Districts of Texas, the Fifth Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court. Martindale lists a B.A. from the University of Texas (1994) and a J.D. from Baylor University (1997); one secondary profile lists a 1996 Baylor graduation date, so the exact year is not fully consistent across sources. She has been selected to Texas Super Lawyers in intellectual property litigation since 2012 and also maintains a personal injury/products liability trial practice.
Firms
Roles
- local counsel31
- Local Counsel21
- Counsel3
- lead counsel1
- counsel in related litigation1
- Lead Counsel, Local Counsel1
- Lead Counsel1
- counsel1
- Counsel for Defendants1
- Local Counsel / Lead Counsel1
- Partner1
Cases (63)
- Δ defendantAdvanced Integrated Circuit Process LLC v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company LtdGillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantAlpha Modus Corp. v. Foot Locker, Inc.Gillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantAtlas Global Technologies LLC v. Dell Technologies, Inc.Gillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantAutoConnect Holdings LLC v. Hyundai Motor America et al.Gillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantAutoConnect Holdings LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantAutonavigare LLC v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantCM HK Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantCobblestone Wireless LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantCyberfone Systems, LLC v. The Charles Schwab CorporationGillam & Smith · local counsel
- π plaintiffDisintermedation Services Inc. v. Dell Inc., et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- π plaintiffDisintermediation Services, Inc. v. Hello UMI S.L.Gillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- π plaintiffDisintermediation Services, Inc. v. Living Spaces Furniture, LLCGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- π plaintiffFast IP, LLC et al. v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantGreenthread, LLC v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- π plaintiffHandsFree Labs Licensing, LLC et al. v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantHandsFree Labs Licensing, LLC et al. v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantHannibal IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantHeadwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantHeadwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- π plaintiffIngeniospec LLC v. UnknownGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantIngeniospec, LLC v. Apple Inc.Gillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantMalikie Innovations Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantMassively Broadband LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantMimzi, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantMultimedia Technologies Pte Ltd. v. Fandango Media, LLCGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantMultimedia Technologies Pte Ltd. v. Tubi, Inc.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantNissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Longhorn Automotive Group LLCGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantNovacloud Licensing LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc.Gillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantOptis Wireless Technology, LLC et al. v. Apple Inc.Gillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantOrthosie Systems, LLC v. AT&T Inc.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantPalisade Technologies LLP v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.Gillam & Smith · lead counsel
- π plaintiffPaneltouch Technologies LLC v. BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantPersonalized Media Communications, LLC v. Google LLCGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantQomplx LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantRadiant Patents LLC v. Nokia Corporation et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantSamsung Electronics America Inc. et al. v. Topwire LLCGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantTQP Development, LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc.Gillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Paygeo LLCGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseGillam & Smith · counsel in related litigation
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · local counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Lead Counsel, Local Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseGillam & Smith · counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Counsel for Defendants
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseGillam & Smith · local counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Local Counsel / Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Partner
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseGillam & Smith · local counsel
- Δ defendantValtrus Innovations Ltd. et al. v. FedEx Corporation et al.Gillam & Smith · local counsel