Patent litigation attorney
Kelly Tripathi
3 tracked appearances — 2 plaintiff · 1 defendant.
Specialty & background
Kelly Tripathi is an Intellectual Property Litigation Partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, where her practice focuses on patent infringement litigation in federal district courts and other intellectual property matters. She has experience across various technology areas, including drug therapy patents, spinal surgery technology, and ophthalmic devices. Additionally, her work has involved patents related to packaging materials, as evidenced by her appearances in matters concerning "recyclable heat shrink film for recyclable containers."
Ms. Tripathi demonstrates experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants in patent disputes, with her tracked appearances including roles on both sides of the litigation in CCL Industries, Inc. v. Brook & Whittle Ltd.. Her firm profile highlights her work in defending clients, including successfully defeating a preliminary injunction for an ophthalmic device company in patent and copyright litigation. Beyond district court, she also possesses experience before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the International Trade Commission.
A notable aspect of her practice involves PTAB proceedings. She has experience with Post-Grant Review (PGR), including a case concerning U.S. Patent No. 11,961,422, which relates to recyclable heat shrink labels. In Multi-Color Corporation v. Brook & Whittle Ltd., a PGR challenging this patent was instituted, with the PTAB determining that the petitioner showed a likelihood of at least one challenged claim being unpatentable. The Director of the USPTO later declined to deny institution based on discretionary considerations in this proceeding.
Ms. Tripathi earned her J.D. from Harvard Law School in 2019, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. She holds a B.S. in Chemistry & Politics, cum laude, from New York University. She is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia (2021) and Virginia (2019).
Firms
Roles
- partner1
- Counsel1
- counsel1
Cases (3)
- π plaintiffCCL Industries, Inc. v. Brook & Whittle Ltd.Kirkland & Ellis · partner
- Δ defendantCCL Industries, Inc. v. Brook & Whittle Ltd.Kirkland & Ellis · Counsel
- π plaintiffSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. Staton Techiya, LLCKirkland & Ellis · counsel