Patent litigation attorney
Jordan T. Bergsten
3 tracked appearances — 1 plaintiff · 2 defendant.
Specialty & background
I'll research this attorney's professional background and patent litigation practice.
I have good baseline information. Let me verify the notable verdicts and check for PTAB/IPR experience.
Let me verify the Sandpiper CDN case and the $139 million cable verdict.
Jordan T. Bergsten — Patent Litigation Practice Summary
Specialty / Focus. Bergsten is a trial-focused patent litigator handling complex, high-stakes disputes between competitors, with particular depth in telephony, online video/streaming, content delivery networks, video game systems, and software-related technologies (semiconductors, datacenter, optical equipment, software encryption, athletic garments, and power-grid systems per his firm bio). He joined Boies Schiller Flexner (BSF) as a partner in May 2024 in Washington, D.C. (with a Kansas City presence), moving from Shook Hardy & Bacon, where he was promoted to partner in 2020. He previously clerked for Judge Nanette K. Laughrey (W.D. Mo.).
Side Preference. Bergsten works both sides of the "v" — his tracked docket shows one plaintiff appearance and two defendant-side appearances at BSF. His firm materials emphasize a hybrid model: a robust defense practice (clients including Sprint/T-Mobile, Rimini Street, UPS, and Coca-Cola) alongside contingency plaintiff work that has recovered over $1 billion. His most prominent plaintiff-side work has been for patent monetization entities: Touchstream Technologies (which Google characterized as a licensing-only entity) and Sandpiper CDN, an NPE asserting content-delivery-network patents.
Notable Cases. Bergsten was on the trial team that secured a $339 million jury verdict for Touchstream against Google over Chromecast streaming patents (Touchstream Technologies v. Google, W.D. Tex., 2023), a result Law360 ranked among the top patent damages awards of 2023. He also tried Touchstream v. Charter Communications (E.D. Tex., before Judge Gilstrap, March 2025), directing the direct examination of Touchstream's founder, and BSF reached settlements against Comcast on Touchstream's behalf in 2025. His firm bio also reports a $139 million willful-infringement verdict against a major cable television company and a defense verdict of non-infringement. His current tracked plaintiff matter is Sandpiper CDN, LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications (E.D. Tex.), where he appeared as counsel of record in March 2026 and the case is at the claim-construction stage.
PTAB / IPR. Bergsten's practice has significant PTAB exposure: after the Google verdict, the team defeated Google's inter partes review challenges, with all Touchstream claims upheld in final written decisions (September 2023) — a result the firm credits to the same trial team. His publications also center on patent damages and § 101/Alice jurisprudence. He does not appear in the tracked data as a regular, standalone IPR counsel.
Bar / Education. Admitted in Missouri (2011; W.D. Mo., D. Kan.); B.S. summa cum laude, Truman State University (2007, Phi Beta Kappa); J.D., UC Berkeley School of Law (2011, California Law Review). D.C. bar status not independently verified.
Firms
Roles
- counsel2
- counsel of record1
Cases (3)
- π plaintiffSandpiper CDN, LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications LLCcounsel of record
- Δ defendantUntitled caseBoies Schiller Flexner · counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseBoies Schiller Flexner · counsel