Patent litigation attorney
Jonathan Ma
27 tracked appearances — 22 plaintiff · 5 defendant.
Specialty & background
Jonathan Ma is a patent litigation attorney at Russ August & Kabat, where his practice is concentrated on intellectual property matters across a range of sophisticated technologies. He has significant experience handling litigation from pre-filing analysis through post-trial motions. Ma's technological focus areas include mobile devices and laptops, networking hardware and software, wireless communications, targeted online advertising, semiconductor processing, multi-core processors, containerization, application migration, and Wi-Fi 6 standard-essential patents (SEPs).
Ma primarily represents plaintiffs, appearing on the plaintiff side in 22 of his 27 tracked cases, often for patent assertion entities (PAEs). His client roster has included Datonics LLC, Intent IQ, LLC, Redstone Logics LLC, VirtaMove Corp., Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc., and Cobblestone Wireless LLC. Conversely, he has defended clients in five tracked cases, demonstrating experience on both sides of patent disputes.
Among notable outcomes, Ma represented the plaintiff in patent infringement litigation that secured a $122 million jury verdict against Amazon relating to targeted online advertising, a dispute that subsequently settled with a license agreement. He has been involved in significant cases for Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc., which assert Wi-Fi 6 SEPs and have engaged in FRAND/RAND discussions with major implementers like Samsung. His work with Cobblestone Wireless LLC has involved cases concerning 3GPP carrier aggregation and wireless network technologies against companies such as Apple, Samsung, AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile, often resulting in dismissals with prejudice, suggesting confidential settlements.
While his firm's publicly available biography does not explicitly detail his individual PTAB engagements, cases involving his clients, such as Datonics/Intent IQ and Redstone Logics, have seen "numerous Inter Partes Review ('IPR') patent-office wins" and ongoing IPR proceedings. Additionally, patents asserted by his clients like Intent IQ, Cobblestone Wireless, and Wilus Institute have been subject to ex parte reexamination, affirming patentability for some claims. Ma earned his J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law in 2016, where he served as an Articles Editor for both the California Law Review and the Berkeley Technology Law Journal. He was admitted to practice in California in 2016.
Firms
Roles
- counsel10
- Counsel8
- lead counsel3
- associate2
- attorney1
- associate counsel1
- Lead Counsel1
Cases (27)
- π plaintiffCobblestone Wireless LLC v. Apple Inc.Russ August & Kabat · Counsel
- Δ defendantCobblestone Wireless LLC v. Apple Inc.Russ August & Kabat · counsel
- π plaintiffCobblestone Wireless LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al.Russ August & Kabat · counsel
- π plaintiffDatonics LLC v. Neustar, Inc.Russ August & Kabat · Counsel
- Δ defendantGoogle LLC v. Virtamove, Corp.Russ August & Kabat
- π plaintiffIntent IQ, LLC v. MNTN, Inc.Russ August & Kabat · associate
- π plaintiffMAGMA SCIENTIFIC, LLC. v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.Russ August & Kabat · counsel
- π plaintiffRedstone Logics LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Russ August & Kabat · counsel
- π plaintiffRedstone Logics LLC v. Apple, Inc.Russ August & Kabat · associate counsel
- π plaintiffRedstone Logics LLC v. MediaTek, Inc. et al.Russ August & Kabat · counsel
- Δ defendantRedstone Logics LLC v. MediaTek, Inc. et al.Russ August & Kabat · attorney
- π plaintiffRedstone Logics LLC v. NXP Semiconductors, N.V. et al.Russ August & Kabat · counsel
- π plaintiffRedstone Logics LLC v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al.Russ August & Kabat · counsel
- Δ defendantSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.Russ August & Kabat · counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseRuss August & Kabat · associate
- π plaintiffUntitled caseRuss August & Kabat · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseRuss August & Kabat · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseRuss August & Kabat · counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseRuss August & Kabat · lead counsel
- π plaintiffVirtamove Corp. v. Google LLCRuss August & Kabat · Counsel
- π plaintiffVirtaMove Corp. v. Hewlett Packard EnterpriseRuss August & Kabat · lead counsel
- π plaintiffVirtamove Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp. et al.Russ August & Kabat · Counsel
- π plaintiffVirtaMove Corp. v. Oracle CorporationRuss August & Kabat · counsel
- π plaintiffWilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc. v. [Unknown Defendant]Russ August & Kabat · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffWilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc. v. HP Inc.Russ August & Kabat · Counsel
- π plaintiffWilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc. v. HP Inc.Russ August & Kabat · lead counsel
- π plaintiffWilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al.Russ August & Kabat · Counsel