Jenna H. Seleznick

I'll research this attorney's background before drafting the summary.

Let me gather more detail on her cases and background.

Let me check for a firm bio with education and bar details, and confirm PTAB involvement.

Jenna H. Seleznick — Patent Litigation Practice Summary

Specialty / focus. Ms. Seleznick is an associate in the Litigation Department of Morrison & Foerster's Washington, D.C. office, where her practice centers on intellectual property litigation, including matters before the U.S. International Trade Commission, in federal district courts, and in arbitration. Morrison Foerster's own practice description identifies her clients as companies in consumer products technology, semiconductor, and software areas. Her tracked matters are consistent with that description: a consumer-electronics camera-technology dispute (ITC Section 337) and a software/enterprise-security patent case. Her tracked record is short (two appearances), so the technology profile rests primarily on the firm's practice description and the two cases rather than a long docket history.

Side preference. Both tracked appearances are on the defense side (0 plaintiff / 2 defendant). In the ITC matter she represented respondent Arashi Vision (Insta360) against GoPro, and in the district court matter she appeared for defendant CrowdStrike against plaintiff Skysong Innovations—a non-practicing entity. On the available record, she defends operating companies rather than prosecuting for NPEs/PAEs, though the small sample size limits how strongly that preference can be characterized.

Firm context. She is at Morrison & Foerster, which is the only firm identified in her tracked appearances. Both tracked cases were staffed through MoFo, and her role in the ITC matter is listed as Associate while the district court appearance is recorded as pro hac vice. No prior firm history or in-house role is reliably sourced.

Notable cases / outcomes.

• GoPro, Inc. v. Insta360 (Arashi Vision), ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1400 — Ms. Seleznick was a member of the Morrison Foerster team (led by partners Lily Li and Mark Whitaker) that secured a complete defense victory for Insta360. In its final determination issued February 26, 2026, the Commission resolved all five asserted utility patents in Insta360's favor—finding the claims invalid, not infringed, or both—and reversed the ALJ's prior infringement finding on the '052 patent. The Commission affirmed that Insta360's updated designs fall outside the asserted design patent, and the limited exclusion order reached only legacy Ace-series models no longer sold in the U.S.
• Skysong Innovations, LLC v. CrowdStrike, Inc., No. 7:25-cv-00040 (W.D. Tex.) — Ms. Seleznick appeared pro hac vice for the CrowdStrike defendants in this patent infringement action filed by Skysong Innovations (identified in Stanford's NPE database as a non-practicing entity). The case was pending as of the most recent docket information available, so no outcome is confirmed.

PTAB / IPR experience. No PTAB appearances by Ms. Seleznick were located in the sources reviewed. Notably, co-defendant CrowdStrike filed an IPR (IPR2025-01170) against Skysong's U.S. Patent No. 11,892,897, instituted December 2025, but the available materials do not confirm her participation in that proceeding. Her PTAB experience should not be assumed on this record.

Bar / education. Not reliably sourced in the materials reviewed; omitted. (MoFo's and Legal 500's listings confirm only her D.C.-office associate status and practice description.)

Note: This profile relies on the two tracked appearances plus Morrison Foerster's and Legal 500's practice listings and public reporting on the ITC final determination. Details such as bar admissions, education, and any docket-level role in the CrowdStrike IPR could not be verified and are flagged as unconfirmed rather than stated.