Jeffrey E. Kubiak

Jeffrey E. Kubiak is a patent litigation attorney primarily practicing with Ramey LLP, a firm recognized for its high volume of patent plaintiff filings nationally. His practice focuses on intellectual property litigation and transactional matters, including patent prosecution, licensing, and infringement and validity opinions. Mr. Kubiak's technical background includes a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering, complementing his work in diverse technologies such as electronic commerce, information discovery and presentation systems, and various engineering fields.

Mr. Kubiak consistently represents plaintiffs in patent infringement cases, with all his tracked appearances being on the plaintiff side. He has represented clients such as AML IP LLC in a suit against Domino's Pizza, Inc., involving a patent for electronic commerce transactions, and Linfo IP, LLC in an action against Vuori, Inc., concerning a patent for information discovery and presentation in text content, which resulted in a patent dismissal. Prior to Ramey LLP, Mr. Kubiak gained experience at The Kubiak Law Firm, PLLC, Wong, Cabello, Lutsch, Rutherford & Brucculeri LLP, and as intellectual property counsel at Weatherford International, Ltd. and general counsel at Borets-Weatherford US, Inc..

Ramey LLP offers expertise in post-grant proceedings before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, including appearances before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and Mr. Kubiak's background includes patent prosecution.

Mr. Kubiak is admitted to practice in Texas, before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He earned his Doctor of Jurisprudence from South Texas College of Law. In recent years, Mr. Kubiak, along with other Ramey LLP attorneys, was personally sanctioned by a Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of California for, among other things, the unauthorized practice of law and avoidance of pro hac vice fees in a case involving client KOJI IP LLC. These sanctions included monetary penalties and a requirement for continuing legal education, and have been subject to appeals to the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court.