Patent litigation attorney
Jameson Pasek
4 tracked appearances — 4 plaintiff · 0 defendant.
Specialty & background
Jameson Pasek — Patent Litigation Practice Summary
Pasek is a Boston-based trial lawyer whose patent docket is almost exclusively plaintiff-side enforcement work (4 of 4 tracked appearances for plaintiffs), representing patent owners and smaller technology companies asserting patents against large operating companies. His patent matters skew toward consumer and wearable technology: the flagship tracked matter, Solos Technology Ltd. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al. (D. Mass., No. 1:26-cv-10304, filed Jan. 2026), asserts five smart-eyewear patents covering audio processing, beamforming, and sensor fusion against Meta, EssilorLuxottica, and Oakley, with "multiple billions" in damages sought. He also handled SherryWear, LLC v. Nike, Inc. (D. Mass., No. 1:23-cv-11599) over pocket-bra patents, and the paired Puff Corp. v. SHO Products / SHO Products v. Puff Corp. disputes (C.D. Cal.) over vaporizer technology, which the firm describes as settling globally on the eve of trial. More broadly, his practice spans trade secrets, securities/shareholder, M&A, and class-action litigation across industries including tech, life sciences, and financial services.
Firm context. Pasek is Director of Litigation at Caldwell (Caldwell Law LLC / Caldwell Intellectual Property Law, LLC, Boston), which he joined in April 2023 as a senior litigation associate after practicing in the litigation groups of two national firms, including McGlinchey Stafford. He is recognized in Legal 500 US Elite (2025, 2026) for commercial litigation and has published on patent damages and Markman practice. He is admitted in Massachusetts (2015) and New York (2022), and holds a J.D. from New England Law | Boston and a B.A. from Assumption College.
Notable outcomes. The Solos v. Meta case is pending before Judge Burroughs; early motion practice includes a Morgan Lewis disqualification bid that was rejected in April 2026. The SherryWear v. Nike litigation was stayed after Nike filed a series of inter partes reviews, and the matter was resolved by settlement.
PTAB/IPR experience. Pasek has hands-on IPR exposure: he served as back-up counsel (pro hac vice) for patent owner SherryWear in IPR2024-01129 and the related sister IPRs (Nike, Inc. v. SherryWear, LLC, IPR2024-01122 through -01129), which were instituted in February 2025 and terminated by settlement in May 2025. He is not a high-volume PTAB regular, but he has meaningful patent-owner-side IPR experience tied to his district court enforcement cases.
Firms
Roles
- Counsel2
- counsel1
Cases (4)
- π plaintiffSolos Technology Limited v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al.Caldwell
- π plaintiffSolos Technology Limited v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al.Caldwell Law · Counsel
- π plaintiffSolos Technology Ltd. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al.Caldwell Intellectual Property Law · counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseCaldwell · Counsel