Patent litigation attorney
James M. Glass
12 tracked appearances — 4 plaintiff · 8 defendant.
Specialty & background
James M. Glass is a prominent patent litigation attorney and the Chair of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's Post-Grant patent practice, where his work encompasses district court litigation, ITC proceedings, and an extensive focus on post-grant proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). He is recognized for handling complex technologies including smartphone, Wi-Fi, semiconductor fabrication, circuitry, networking, graphical user interfaces, online advertising, and medical device technologies.
Glass has a balanced practice, actively representing both plaintiffs and defendants. His tracked appearances show 7 cases on the defendant side and 4 on the plaintiff side, demonstrating his versatility in patent disputes. Before his tenure at Quinn Emanuel, where he has accumulated 10 tracked appearances, he also represented clients at Carlson, Gaskey & Olds. He is particularly noted for his leadership in post-grant proceedings, having served as lead counsel in over 500 such cases for both petitioners and patent owners, and has been consistently ranked among the top-performing and most active PTAB attorneys. He has also been recognized by Lawdragon 500 for Leading Global IP Lawyers in Patent Litigation, Post-Grant for 2025.
His notable case work includes representing Valve Corporation as a defendant in Valve Corporation v. Ironburg Inventions Ltd., a case involving gaming hardware where a jury found willful infringement and awarded over $4 million in damages, and which saw a Federal Circuit appeal clarifying IPR estoppel standards. He has also defended Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in Xifi Networks R&D, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. concerning Wi-Fi 7 technology and represented Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp as a defendant in a patent dispute over modular storage systems that was voluntarily dismissed. On the plaintiff side, he represented Cloud Byte LLC in litigation against Dell Technologies, Inc. involving networking and storage technologies. Glass successfully defended NantWorks against a series of IPR petitions from Bank of America, securing patentability findings affirmed by the Federal Circuit, and similarly defended Juul Labs, Inc. in IPRs against Njoy LLC, where most petitions were denied institution or claims found patentable after trial. He was also lead counsel for Google in a patent infringement case related to online advertising technology, securing a unanimous jury verdict of non-infringement and invalidity, which was fully affirmed by the Federal Circuit.
His expertise extends to appellate advocacy at the Federal Circuit, where he has successfully defended trial wins, and he is admitted to practice before the USPTO. Glass is a New York-barred attorney, having been admitted in 1999 after graduating from Hofstra University School of Law in 1998. He frequently contributes to legal discourse, including co-authoring articles for Law360 and Reuters on the evolving landscape of post-grant proceedings and director review at the PTAB.
Firms
Roles
- Lead Counsel7
- lead counsel3
- counsel1
- Lead Counsel for IPRs1
Cases (12)
- π plaintiffCloud Byte LLC v. Dell Technologies, Inc. et al.Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantDell Technologies, Inc. et al. v. Cloud Byte LLCQuinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · lead counsel
- Δ defendantEthanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al. v. Ford Motor CompanyQuinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantK. Mizra LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantMilwaukee Electric Tool Corp v. Klein Tools, Inc.Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. OMNI MEDSCI, INC.Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffSK Hynix, Inc. v. Advanced Memory Technologies LLCQuinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents, LLC v. Radian Memory Systems LLCQuinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseQuinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseQuinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · Lead Counsel for IPRs
- Δ defendantValve Corporation v. Ironburg Inventions Ltd.Carlson, Gaskey & Olds · counsel
- Δ defendantXifi Networks R&D, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan · lead counsel