Patent litigation attorney
James D. Johnson
1 tracked appearance — 1 plaintiff · 0 defendant.
Specialty & background
James D. Johnson's patent litigation practice, as tracked, primarily involves representing plaintiffs in intellectual property disputes. His known experience includes representing ETN Capital LLC as a plaintiff in the case ETN Capital LLC v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Based on publicly available information about ETN Capital LLC, the firm appears to be active in patent enforcement, particularly in the realm of RV-related technology, such as leveling systems, as evidenced by a related inter partes review (IPR) proceeding involving an RV leveling system patent. This suggests Johnson's practice may focus on software or mechanical technologies within the automotive or recreational vehicle industries. With a sole tracked appearance on the plaintiff side, his practice, at least as represented by the provided case data, leans towards enforcing patent rights rather than defending against infringement allegations.
Identifying a specific firm context and notable case outcomes for this particular James D. Johnson beyond the tracked case is challenging due to the prevalence of attorneys with the same name. While several attorneys named James D. Johnson or James David Johnson practice intellectual property law, including one in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, who explicitly handles complex patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret litigation, and another in Savannah, Georgia, specializing in intellectual property, a definitive link of ETN Capital LLC v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. to a specific firm or additional professional background for the attorney in question could not be reliably sourced.
No specific information regarding this James D. Johnson's regular appearance in PTAB or IPR proceedings could be definitively confirmed from public records. Similarly, reliable details on bar admissions and education, specifically tied to this particular attorney and his patent litigation practice, were not consistently available across the various individuals sharing the name.
Cases (1)
- π plaintiffETN Capital LLC v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.