Heather R. Malkowski

I'll research this attorney before writing the summary.

Summary — Heather R. Malkowski (Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP)

Practice focus and side preference. The structured case data is thin: a single tracked appearance, as counsel for the defendant in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amgen Inc. That record shows a defense-side practice in patent litigation, with no tracked plaintiff-side work. Because the sample is one case, it would be overreading the data to characterize her as a defense-only litigator; the honest description is that her tracked litigation activity is entirely on the defense side, and specifically in the life-sciences/biosimilar space rather than in Wi-Fi, software, or mechanical arts. Regeneron v. Amgen is the widely reported dispute over Regeneron's aflibercept (Eylea) patent portfolio against Amgen's proposed aflibercept biosimilar, though I could not verify her specific role, motion practice, or any outcome attributable to her through web search.

Firm context. She is associated with Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP (Chicago), a firm known for IP prosecution and litigation. Her contact address in a public District of Delaware docket filing — hmalkowski@marshallip.com — corroborates the Marshall Gerstein affiliation. Searches did not surface a firm bio page, prior-firm history, or any in-house role for her.

Notable cases and PTAB experience. The only tracked matter is Regeneron v. Amgen, and no tracked IPR/PGR proceedings appear in the data provided. Searches returned no PTAB filings, Federal Circuit appeals, verdicts, or settlements specifically naming her, so I cannot report results with any confidence. Publicly reported outcomes in that litigation exist, but nothing verifiable tied to her individually.

Bar / education. Not reliably sourced; searches returned no bar-admission or education records, so I've omitted them rather than guess.

Disambiguation note. Searches surfaced a "Dennis Malkowski" listed as an inventor on patents prosecuted by Marshall, Gerstein & Borun (e.g., U.S. Patent 10,315,847). That is a different individual and not the attorney profiled here. The single substantive public hit for the attorney herself is an email/docket contact in Kaufmann, Adam (D. Del. Case No. 1:17-cv-00751-78), which evidences her firm affiliation but not necessarily an appearance.